The New York Times endorsed Frank Lautenberg for the Democratic U.S. Senate nomination. Sensing their work in New Jersey was over, the declined to cover the debate between Lautenberg and Rob Andrews on NJN Friday night. The newspaper is backing Dick Zimmer for the GOP Senate nod. Their decision not to cover the lone TV debate in the Lautenberg-Andrews primary comes a week after they moved their talented Bureau Chief, David Chen, from Trenton to New York City Hall. The New York Times, perhaps reading Jon Corzine’s memo on filling vacancies slowly, has not yet announced who – if anyone – will represent the New York Times in New Jersey.
Snarky comment: if the GOP had kept Andy Unanue in the race, and if Lautenberg wins the Democratic primary, would the New York Times need someone in New Jersey to cover the U.S. Senate race?
New Jersey Network reporter Zachary Fink was named on Friday as the new statehouse correspondent for NJN News. Fink replaces Jim Hooker, who ... >
There's nothing more difficult to see than the history before your eyes. It sometimes takes generations to understand the significance of ... >
OK, he didn't say precisely that, but when the Chairman of the Budget Committee informs us that governmental spending is the key to prosperity, ... >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
The sub prime mortgage melt down and its ensuing financial “crisis” has tested the mettle of all of us who believe in and support the free ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
The media, which loves headlines and knows little history, is trying to sell President Elect Obama as another Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But that ... >
Whenever I get the chance to visit my parents in Florida when working a comedy gig down there, it’s like living in a “Seinfeld” episode. They ... >
In an election year driven by a hemorrhaging economy and an electorate hungry for an end to divisive politics, 7th Congressional District candidate ... >
A couple of weeks ago, my mother, Angelina Katz, did her second debate on behalf of Barack Obama. A debate? My mother? If you knew her, you’d be ... >
Former State Senator Wayne Bryant got a smack on the back of the head from a jury of his peers today when they found him guilty of all eleven charges ... >
NY Times is shrinking
Their coverage on NJ was very limited, the NJ section gone, and now they have completely ignored the close in the Senate race. I think they have money problems and as usual, NJ gets the short end
NY Times
agree with Dave, the NY Times has largely abandoned covering NJ issues on a regular basis. The Metro section basically covers the 5 boroughs only.
Even when they do report on a NJ story, it reads like a press release...not much intrepid reporting. More often than not, they report a story the day after the Star-Ledger has broken it.
What happened to the the two Davids?
There were two david, both with hard to pronounce names like Halbfounter and Kaswineski or something like that. Both great reporters. What happened to them? they were both assigned to cover NJ light years ago...
Concur with ya' all
The writing has been on the wall for some time. Kudos to the Philly Inquirer for adding Jon Tamari in the statehouse to Cynthia Burton on the politics beat. Perhaps this is also a sign that George Norcross is preparing for his big push to take over the state, making NYT's coverage area less relevant.