March 5, 2009 - 4:00pm
Press Release

Want access to post press releases? To sign up, use this form. You must be logged in.

ASSEMBLY APPROVES VAINIERI HUTTLE/CRUZ-PEREZ BILL TO OUTLAW DANGEROUS ‘HENNA’ TATTOOS

ASSEMBLY APPROVES VAINIERI HUTTLE/CRUZ-PEREZ BILL TO OUTLAW DANGEROUS ‘HENNA’ TATTOOS

Measure Would Ban Use of Toxic Ink Linked to Permanent Scarring, Injuries

(TRENTON) – Legislation Assemblywomen Valerie Vainieri Huttle and Nilsa Cruz-Perez sponsored to prevent the selling of temporary “henna” tattoos that contain a powerful and dangerous chemical found to cause scarring and other disfiguring skin injuries was approved 74-2 with three abstentions today by the Assembly.

Many black or blue henna tattoos contain phelylendiamine (PPD), a chemical that can cause severe dermatitis, eye irritation and tearing, asthma, gastritis, renal failure, vertigo, tremors, convulsions and comas in humans.  PPD is an ingredient also commonly found in hair dye products, textile or fur dyes, photographic developer, printing inks, black rubbers, oils, greases and even gasoline. 

According to the federal Food and Drug Administration, PPD is not approved for direct application to the skin.

“Vacationers and children may be unaware that the whimsical temporary tattoo they purchase can produce permanent problems,” said Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen).  “It is unconceivable that children are being exposed to a dangerous chemical that can produce lifelong scars.”

Vainieri Huttle and Cruz-Perez noted the popularity of temporary henna tattoos at boardwalk kiosks, carnivals and other tourism attractions around the state. The tattoos – cheaper and less painful than traditional, permanent needle-applied tattoos – are popular with children too young to be tattooed and adults who do not want a permanent marking on their skin.

A Jan. 5, 2007 article in The Record of Hackensack reported that some New Jersey families have launched lawsuits against a national company that provides PPD-based inks used in henna tattoos.

“We need common sense restrictions in place to protect young people from unknowingly putting themselves in dangers’ way,” said Cruz-Perez (D-Camden).  “No one should be introduced to this chemical.”
Under the bill (A-2144), violations of the PPD-based tattoo prohibition would be punishable under the state’s Sanitary Code. Each violation would constitute a separate offense, punishable by a fine of $50 to $1,000, recoverable in a civil action.

The bill also would require body-art establishments to provide consumers with written notification about the potential risks of temporary tattoos and require a parental signature if the consumer is under the age of 18.
The bill now heads to the Senate for further consideration.

On the Net:

www.assemblydems.com
www.youtube.com/user/njassemblydems
New Jersey Assembly Democrats on Facebook

 

TEEL can be reached via email at ateel@njleg.org.