FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 15, 2006 CONTACT: (201) 602-4468
CASHA CONTINUES TO BEG QUESTIONS ON DOUBLE-DIPPING
Without answering them, candidate actually harms the cause of reform
Morris Plains, NJ – Responding to Assembly candidate Larry Casha’s statement yesterday on pension double-dipping, Webber for Assembly spokesman Tom Weisert released the following statement:
Larry Casha correctly emphasized the importance of the work of the Legislature’s joint committee on state worker benefits and the problem with pension double-dipping. Larry’s press release, however, continues to beg questions about his true commitment to pension reform.
Larry still has to explain why, if he finds the practice of public official double-dipping on public pensions so abhorrent, Larry has worked so hard on behalf of Senator Bob Martin as his Policy Director, Campaign Counsel, Campaign Coordinator, and Senate Advisory Committee member. Senator Martin, of course, was dubbed by The Star Ledger in September 2002 and March 2006 as one of the worst abusers of the public pension system, as he double-dips and tacks pension credits as both a State Legislator and a municipal attorney in Pompton Lakes. In fact, the March 2006 Star Ledger article situates Bob Martin right next to very same Sharpe James at whom Larry targeted his criticism yesterday. It was precisely that abuse by Senator Martin that Jay Webber stood up to when he challenged the Senator in 2003, and it was part of Senator Martin’s record that Larry worked so hard to defend.
Public pension excesses and the practice of double-dipping by part-time politicians are serious abuses that have strained the public’s trust in our State’s elected representatives. Because of that strain, credibility in candidates for office is paramount, now more than ever. While Webber for Assembly welcomes Larry’s statements on this issue, we believe that before anyone can take seriously Larry’s new-found position on double-dipping, he must answer the following questions that he has ignored since July 21st, when Webber for Assembly first asked them:
– Did Larry resign from his multiple positions with Senator Martin in protest over the Senator’s years-long pension abuses?
– Did Larry at least urge the Senator to change his abusive ways?
– Or did Larry just go along with the abuses, and only now, when he wants to be elected himself, is Larry taking a stand against double-dipping?
– If double-dipping is so wrong, why did Larry coordinate the campaign of Bob Martin and position the Senator to perpetuate the pension abuse?
Without a credible explanation of Larry’s blatantly inconsistent public positions on this issue, we fear that the electorate will only be further disillusioned, and view Larry’s statements as hollow campaign rhetoric. That, in turn, will do more harm than good for the cause of reform, because New Jersey cannot afford that kind of cynicism anymore.
* * *
Read More >