Barry Albin

  • FRIDAY, JANUARY 9, 2009
    Winners:
    Jeh Charles Johnson, , Frank Pallone, , Carol Barrett, , Steve Lonegan, , Chris Christie, , , , , , , , , , ,
    Losers:
    Barry Albin, Deborah Trout, New York Times
  • January 8, 2009 - 1:47pm
    INSIDE EDGE

    Not Grandpa's Judiciary Committee anymore: GOP Senators want three days set aside for Albin confirmation hearing

    The New Jersey Supreme Court

    The GOP seems to be gearing up for a real Senate confirmation hearing if Governor Jon Corzine reappoints Barry Albin to the New Jersey Supreme Court later this year.  The Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have asked Chairman Paul Sarlo to set aside "at least three days" for hearing on Albin's potential nomination.  This would be a huge change for a committee that typically spends just a few hours reviewing Supreme Court nominees.

    Some insiders say Albin could have a problem if two unrelated constituencies wind up opposing his renomination. Albin angered progressive Democrats when he wrote the Supreme Court decision opposing same sex marriage.  And he has a potential problem with conservatives over his votes in support of Abbot school district funding.  Republicans and liberal Democrats could forge an interesting coalition. 

    Under the current State Constitution, no sitting Justice has been denied reappointment or confirmation.  Chief Justice Robert Wilentz barely survived in 1986, winning Senate confirmation by a narrow 21-19 margin.  Peter Verniero, whose renomination was viewed as potentially problematic, saw the handwriting on the wall and resigned before the end of his first seven-year term.

    Albin, 56, was appointed to the top court by Gov. James E. McGreevey in 2002.  If he is renominated and confirmed by the Senate in 2009, he can serve until he turns seventy in 2023.

    Read More >
    January 8, 2009 - 12:19pm
    PRESS RELEASE

    Republican Judiciary Committee Members Seek Full Vetting of Supreme Court Justice

    Senators seek a thorough and thoughtful review of the qualifications of a justice who could serve on the state's highest court for another 14 years.

    Read More >
    Syndicate content