Corzine, Christie, and Daggett: Here's how you cut taxes and spending

Murray is bitter that Daggett has surpassed him as the most recognizable NJ 3rd partier

His plan is as laughable as his commercial, his fundraising and his assertions that he's not in this race to help Corzine. If the liberal media weren't on the same team, Daggett would already have been exposed to be the fraud he is.

"Maverick" Murray The Moocher's claim to fifteen minutes of fame rests with his ability in 1997 to con gullible libertarians into sending him money so he could qualify for taxpayer-funded welfare for his campaign managers and consultants. Beyond that he has spent nearly his entire life schnoring off the taxpayers from attending taxpayer-funded government primary schools since childhood, to taxpayer-subsidized higher education at government owned universities, to a taxpayer-funded paycheck at the government owned school he works for.

And make no mistake, Murray and his cronies like Rick Shaftan have financially profited from his various though politically fruitless political campaigns. I'm always fascinated by so-called libertarians who are so anxious, and practically make a career out of, becoming part of the political system they claim so much to despise.

Let's see how anxious Murray will be to join the ranks of unemployed state workers if everything he says he wants to happen becomes reality.

http://christiegonewild.blogspot.com/

I predicted the collapse of the Soviet Union at the same time our government-sposnored and funded CIA (information agency?) was still touting the "success" of Soviet-style socialism. My lawyer colleagues thought I was completely bonkers, even after I recited the "facts" as I understood them at the time. When the USSR imploded, none of these people mea culpaed . . . they simply shrugged and gave the happening an "ole'". I tried hard not to be smug . . .

European-style socialism is a failure as well, for some of the same reasons and some different ones, too. What is ironic is that many European social democracies with socialist economic models are now rejecting those models and moving toward more market-based economies . . . ironic because the U.S. is clearly moving in the opposite direction. Duh.

No one knows what a collapse will bring. Probably many different things in many different parts of the country. Some states will likely ignore the federal government when the money becomes useless, which may lead to even more onerous authoritarianism (yes, perhaps even worse than that of Bush and Obama) and could even spark widespread secession movements with regional realignments (like the former Soviet Union). And some civil unrest will likely accompany any such collapse, particularly in the urban areas where the majoprity of the populace is most dependent upon government largesse for its very existence.

But what has become abundantly clear is that the current arrangement is simply unsustainable and completely unacceptable. Thus, it behooves us to support the pols who will bring it to an end most quickly.

Lbertarians will not be proven wrong about anything. Libertarians support an unfettered market because it is consistent with the concept of self-ownership and its collary, the non-aggression principle. It is nice that the free market does, in fact, provide the greatest good for the greatest number, but that is wholly incidental to the libertarian idea. In other words, if slavery could be found to be "efficient" libertarians would eschew slavery as inconcistent with the concept of self-ownership and non-aggression.

Conservatives support some less free model because they claim such a model is more "efficient" than any alternative interventionist model. Presumably, conservatives would support slavery if it could be shown to be more "efficient" than the free market.

Libertarians have no particular allegiance to the idea of free markets as such, but only insofar as such a system is consistent with libertarian principles.

It is true that the various forms of interventionist models all share the same functional difficulty: a lack of a rational price system. Economic waste is the result, as ure as night follows day. Such systems are therefore unsustainable in the long run.

In his quest to finally pick a winner since he's incapable of winning himself, Murray Sabring chose Chris Christie for governor even though he knows Christie is just slightly to the right of Corzine! Murray did this because he didn't want to see Mayor Steve Lonegan win the GOP Primary and it's his version of "pay back" because Lonegan endorsed Joe Pennachio for the US Senate. Sabrin has nothing in common with Christie. He knows Christie has no plan, but he so eagerly wants to be with a winning candidate even though it seems Chrsitie is on the verge of blowing the race because he has no plan when it comes to taxes. Sabrin was cover and testament for conservative values Christie is "renting" until November 3rd. He couldn't pull this charade with Lonegan, but Murray is too desperate to know any better! Vote Column "A" - All the way!

I love reading posts allegedly outlining "reality".

There's a difference between natural reality and political reality. Eventually, over time, natural reality overtakes political reality, particularly where, as here in New Jersey, the current political reality is based upon a completely flawed understanding of natural reality.

If political reality is consistent with natural reality, political reality becomes almost invisible and irrelevant, if not redundant. Minimal conflict. If current political reality is inconsistent with natural reality, events will eventually trump current political reality and impose a new political reality. Much conflict during the readjustment.

Simply put, the long term favors those whose ideology is more compatible with natural reality. And the existence of a large number of adherents of an incompatible, but current political reality will not prevent (but can delay for some time) the readjustment of political reality to natural reality.

In the case of the Soviet Union, it took over 70 years for natural reality to take down the existing political reality. The vast majority of the Soviet population, on the eve of its collapse, still thought that the USSR was a viable and strong political entity, even as many hated and distrusted the regime controlling it.

In short, democracy is not reality and cannot create reality. What people believe to be true, even large numbers of them, if erroneous, will not prevent the eventual readjustment to a state consistent with natural reality.

The question is not IF a collapse will occur; rather, the question is WHEN IT WILL OCCUR AND HOW SEVERE WILL THE READJUSTMENT WILL HAVE TO BE.

[The GOP, with its traditional accomodationist, incrementalist statism, is simply getting in the way of a much-needed readjustment. Electing pols like Christie will just serve to perhaps put off the readjustment to a later date, but will increase the severity of the readjustment.]

Libertarian-minded people will never be elected to the Governorship of New Jersey. Never. Following the breakdown of national representative democracy and the accompanying political realignment (regionalization), most likely some states will opt to align with other states to institute social democracies and other states will opt for more libertarian political organization. Dr. Sabrin and I and others who understand and recognize the political primacy of individual property rights will simply move to to those places (if we're still on the right side of the lillies).

Unless some real change in the general ideological orientation of New Jersey occurs, I see NJ as an ongoing failure, destined to impoverish and enslave its reamining people. Producers, entrepreneurs and libertarians will leave, leaving only those who cling to the false ideology of statism to loot each other. Those left will find out the hard way that you can't vote yourself rich, no matter how many elections you hold and how many democrats or republicans you elect.

And that's the reality of it.

Corzine complaining about Christie Being fat. Christie complaining about photo-ops and emails. Both candidates can do little more than to sidetrack voter's from the fact they both duck the issues and offer no real plan.

Why not write about the issue that matter, like the plaque of corruption and scandal that has been brought on our state or how you plan on dealing with the exodus of business, residents and income from our state? No let's complain about photo-ops, emails and people being fat.

However, as echoed by the Star Ledger endorsement of Chris Daggett, we finally have chance to change all of this.NJ voter's are the only ones that have the power to change our government

I am working hard to spread that message and so can you. Click here to learn how.

to find out what they are spending our tax dollars on.

Democrat Freeholders Julie O'Brien & Vernon Walton don't bother to read spending bills before they vote for them. Watch this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT2KRO6RcqY

Wake up Bergen County - these people don't care about you - they just want the power that comes with spending your money. Vote out ALL incumbents!