Republican State Chairman Jay Webber today accused Governor Corzine of "manipulating official data for the Governor's reelection," but Department of Workforce and Labor Development Commissioner David Socolow said that would be impossible.
At issue was a downward revision of the number of private sector jobs created in July from 13,000 to 5,600. The Governor used the 13,000 in his reelection campaign as evidence that his economic policies are working.
Given the leaked email Corzine Deputy Chief of Staff Mark Matzen sent to department heads asking them to "get creative" to show how Corzine's economic policies were creating jobs, however, Webber said the revision could not be based on an innocent mistake.
"This memo that we found yesterday lends credence to the suspicion that those numbers were artificially inflated in August," he said.
But Socolow said that the unemployment numbers come from the federal government, and that while his office has a role in inputting some additional data, it would be impossible to fudge anything.
"All of this is done essentially with a [Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics] methodology. It's validated by BLS and using BLS data. We don't report anything. We do data entry into the national system, and the national office validates it and compares it to the other states," he said. "We don't have any opportunity to change these numbers."
Webber, however, pointed to an article in the conservative National Review Online that compared this state's statistics to others and found that New Jersey's estimates were always more optimistic.
"New Jersey, in this election season, seems to only estimate job creation numbers. If it could be blamed on the federal government, you would expect other states to mirror that New Jersey's out of step," said Webber, who is also an Assemblyman from Morris Plains.
But Socolow held that significant revisions are common. In a benchmark revision for the entire year of 2006, it turned out 30,000 more jobs had been created than originally estimated. For 2003, there were 60,000 fewer jobs created than estimated.
The November, 2008 estimate was revised downward by 19,600 jobs -- three times larger than the revision for the July estimate -- while the February, 2009 estimate was later revised upward by 5,200 jobs.
Webber, Socolow said, does not understand the way the estimates are compiled if he thinks the DLW can manipulate them.
"It's an impossibility. He doesn't understand the system," he said.
Michael Doherty. a West Point graduate and one of the state's most conservative legislators, will take his seat in the State Senate today. A ... >
Everybody needs to start a new job with a list of priorities and Chris Christie is no exception. There might be a thousand things that need to get ... >
Political discourse in America contains much in the way of intellect or intellectual honesty. One considers the Federalist Papers with wistful awe: ... >
As pundits and party leaders look to next year’s Congressional elections in NJ, it appears that freshman Democrat John Adler is the most vulnerable ... >
When will NJ Republicans start acting like Republicans rather than Democrats. Time to stand up for your principles, assuming they have any left. >
As in any transition, speculation is rampant as to whom Governor-elect Chris Christie will appoint as Chief of Staff, State Treasurer, and Attorney ... >
Now that the dust has finally settled after the grueling campaign for governor, there are a number of lessons that we can draw from this ... >
When he was growing up, Chris Christie's folks must have taught him that when he went to a new playground, he should pick a fight with the ... >
Back in 1974, when NYC was facing a mounting financial crisis, then-Mayor Abe Beame went to then-President Ford and asked for financial help from ... >
New Jersey voters repudiated Governor Jon Corzine's policies of the past four years on November 3rd. Republican Chris Christie and Independent ... >
You can fool . . .
. . . some of the people some of the time . . .
Jobs are leaving New Jersey
A recent survey showed that New Jersey has one of the most unfriendly environments for business in the entire Unted States of America. Businesses are leaving and so are the jobs. This state is an economic basket case. Recently the Corzine administration made a big annoucemnet that a firm with 1,600 employees was moving from Manhattan to Jersey City. But that does not mean 1,600 new jobs since all of those people will simply cross the river and keep jobs. So, there were no new jobs created by Corzine. Also the state gave this firm a $90 million dollar package to move here. Why did they not do the same for a firm that might have brought some new jobs? I see little benefit from this action. I would also speculate that the move may have been a deal by Corzine to help out his financial pals across the river. You know the good old boy network.How much did this firm donate to the Corzine campaign?