State Sen. Loretta Weinberg may have put aside hostilities with Bergen County Democratic Chairman Joe Ferriero back in April, but she’s not going to let up on criticizing him.
“He’s been a very prolific fundraiser. He has worked hard to get Democrats elected, and I give him a lot of credit for that,” said Weinberg. “But I would like the organization to be about something more than fundraising and who gets what contract.”
In April, Weinberg boosted her already considerable political profile in Bergen County, beating a slate of candidates that Ferriero picked to run against her in the 37th district: Englewood Mayor Michael Wildes and his running mates for assembly, former Assemblyman Ken Zisa and Bergen County Improvement Authority Commissioner Cid Wilson. It was the second time she beat off a challenge by Ferriero, having won the primary election against him in 2005.
Since Ferriero’s candidates faced what looked like insurmountable odds, he dropped the challenge in what most observers say was an effort to save face. Weinberg, in turn, has seen her political stock rise from taking on and triumphing against such a powerful chairman.
But Weinberg said she wants to set the record straight on one point: neither she nor anyone else promised anything to Ferriero in exchange for getting him to drop his slate.
“I don’t know why anybody doesn’t just accept what took place here,” said Weinberg. “Joe Ferriero took a look at the polling numbers and from his point of view took the smart, best way out. He saved himself a lot of money and a public humiliation. It was as simple as that.”
Ferriero could not be reached for comment, but Garden State Equality Chairman Steven Goldstein, a close friend of Weinberg, had some idea of what he received by dropping his ticket.
“In New Jersey, if you lose once you get a pass. Lose twice in New Jersey politics and you’re seen as vulnerable,” said Goldstein.
Goldstein went on to note that Weinberg had been able to do something uncommon in New Jersey politics: earn strong support from both labor organizations and progressive political groups. She may now be able to use her bolstered position and strong reputation to check Ferriero on what she considers his political bossism and propensity towards pay to play contracts.
"Am I going to continue lobbying within my party to change some of the ways we do business? Absolutely. Am I going to continue lobbying against the kind of excessive pay to play that I’ve seen going on? Absolutely,” said Weinberg.
Observers say that Bergen County has likely not seen the end of the feud between the two political powerhouses.
“It would not surprise me if there are squabbles. The deal is that Weinberg was there before Ferriero,” said David Rebovich, managing director of the Rider University Institute for New Jersey Politics. “She’s not his girl or guy. She has her own constituency and she’s carried the day herself. Historically, she has not been dependent on his political machine.”
Two New Jersey Congressmen are at opposite ends of a intra-party battle for the the chairmanship of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of ... >
There's nothing more difficult to see than the history before your eyes. It sometimes takes generations to understand the significance of ... >
OK, he didn't say precisely that, but when the Chairman of the Budget Committee informs us that governmental spending is the key to prosperity, ... >
The Star Ledger got it right last April when it gave a thumb's-up to the NJN management plan to wean “the state's only public ... >
The sub prime mortgage melt down and its ensuing financial “crisis” has tested the mettle of all of us who believe in and support the free ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
The media, which loves headlines and knows little history, is trying to sell President Elect Obama as another Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But that ... >
Whenever I get the chance to visit my parents in Florida when working a comedy gig down there, it’s like living in a “Seinfeld” episode. They ... >
In an election year driven by a hemorrhaging economy and an electorate hungry for an end to divisive politics, 7th Congressional District candidate ... >
A couple of weeks ago, my mother, Angelina Katz, did her second debate on behalf of Barack Obama. A debate? My mother? If you knew her, you’d be ... >
A press release on the official Union County web site admittedly made me snicker just a bit today because it brought back to mind something my late ... >
A missed opportunity.
Weinberg should have challenged him countywide. Given the results in places like Bergenfield, Weinberg would have won...
Ferriero's political organization is paper mache.
Paper Mache?
Let us not underestimate the sheer blunt force power of MONEY. The "mother's milk" of (pay to play) politics.
Having said that, I agree that Weinberg should have gone "for the kill" and run a full slate across the board.
I dare say, many of the folks who voted in the primary only voted for column two because it had a full slate.
If there ever is a REAL contest between the politics of Ferriero vs that of Weinberg; she will win hands down.
The ONLY (kind of) "valid" reason to vote for the machine ticket (in EITHER PARTY) is if you are a direct beneficiary...all others get the short end of the stick in one way or another.
Pay to play is not really a very efficient/effective way to run government. The built in legalized bribery makes everything that gets done more expensive than it needs to be AND it results in all manner in unjust screwings of average (read unconnected/middle/working class) families.
Imagine how different all our banking and insurance and environment and real estate and consumer protection laws would be if the people who wrote those laws were not bought and paid for by the monied interests who profit from the corrupt status quo?
Imagine a NJ that was actually run for the benefit of the PEOPLE who lived there; not just the small fraction that has it's bloodsucking fangs sunk into the lives of the hardworking law abiding shlubs who actually CREATE whatever wealth there is in this state!
Imagine living in a state where it was a CRIMINAL offense to give a politician more than, say, twenty bucks (which would then be proportionally matched using transparant formulas in quantities lare enough to fund campaigns)!
Imagine living in a NJ where massive corporations were legally prohibited from buying influence in Trenton!
If/When the average people in NJ (most of who do NOT VOTE...and see politics as a dirty/hopeless) business) come around to believing that they CAN actually make a difference by voting; they will come out in droves to register and to vote for real reformers like Loretta Weinberg!
It's in the interests of the bosses to keep the status quo, to keep people cynical, apathetic, passively pissed off and "caged" in a defeatist/helpless political mode.
I urge Loretta and ALL people of integrity/good will and common human decency to get behind an effort to clean up NJ politics from the roots on up through to the leaves!
Let's show the rest of the nation what can be done when the people of NJ "rewrite the book" on politics!
When we put aside our fixed ideas of what's "practical" and/or "doable"; what was seemingly impossible actually becomes the inevitable!
Here's a brief clip of Steven speaking on behalf of the Weinberg team.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkR9T0ukNF8
Ferrierro was smart to pull his tactical retreat by surrendering his candidates out of the race; but I don't think that ploy/game will work so well next time around...
From Frederick Douglass
I'm glad
"He has worked hard to get Democrats elected, and I give him a lot of credit for that,” said Weinberg. “But I would like the organization to be about something more than fundraising and who gets what contract.”
Somehow that sounds familiar.
I'm glad Senator Weinberg stands too tall with both labor organizations and progressive political groups to be thrown under the bus before the job is done. Much has been accomplished thanks to Senator Weinberg and other legislators stepping up to the plate with a Governor that will lead and back them up on reform issues. Miles yet to go before they can all rest.
Chairman Ferriero is a smart man. As demonstrated in this and other instances, he knows how to adapt to survive and keep winning races. The squabbles will indeed continue, and continue to spread beyond Senator Weinberg's district if the chairman's position changes not.
He risks not only losing more internal party battles, but control of more towns that he worked so hard and invested so much money in to win in order to control those local contracts. I'll bet more on him reining himself in to survive than that he will continue to fight the rising tide from the waves of reform emanating from the Governor's office above and the party rank and file below.
Happy Fathers Day to all.
The Wages of Wagers...
Matt Ahearn says...
"I'll bet more on him reining himself in to survive than that he will continue to fight the rising tide from the waves of reform emanating from the Governor's office above and the party rank and file below."
A fascinating speculation/projection.
If we see Joe Ferriero sincerely adopting progressive people oriented politics as "his own"; then he will have come around to, in effect, becoming Loretta Weinberg...and that would be cool (to say the least ;-)!
Matt you are right in that Ferriero is intelligent and adaptable; but what needs to happen here goes way beyond a cosmetic "fix" geared toward superficial "reforms" while leaving the underlying rot unaffected.
Frankly, I don't really like the idea that this discussion seems to be about one man vs one woman. It ain't that simple.
Joe Ferriero is not the disease; he's a symtom. On a personal level, he can come off as a charming decent fellow. To the extent that we allow this to become merely a matter of personalities we are off the mark.
If he resigned and retired tomorrow there would likely be another version taking over the next day.
The changes that are needed are systemic.
The tragicomic irony of all this is that the folks who profit from feeding off a corrupt (albeit legal) status quo don't necessarily see themselves as "bad" people.
I suspect truly conscious evil, in human beings, is rare (if it exists at all). (The question arises as to whether sociopaths are fully conscious...but that's another discussion for another time.)
We are all flawed imperfect human beings subject to the temptations of ego and the material world.
Our fears, insecurities and extant political/social/economic cultures combine to create a kind of petri dish in which the most ruthless/aggressive characters (i.e. bullies) tend to dominate.
Unfortunately for the human race, what is adaptive "survival of the fittest" behavior at the level of the animal world just isn't good enough in the realm of human existence.
On the contrary, unbridled competition is, literally, inhuman and can only lead to the eventual extinction of our species.
Politics can be about more than the base satisfaction of personal powerlust.
What Bergen County (and the rest of the state/nation/world) needs is for thousands of (relatively ;-) secure, sane, loving, smart, informed, competent, strong, creative and courageous people to become involved in politics at all levels.
The status quo is not sustainable in the long run.
We will either evolve a politics of common human decency; or the cumulative consequences of systemic corruption will bring systemic collapse.
The question/challenge of how we become "secure, sane, loving, smart, informed, competent, strong, creative and courageous people" is one I'm trying to work on...I know I certainly have a long way to go on that path.
PS (getting back to brass tacks...) As for the pressure for reform from the governors office...I have to wonder how serious Corzine is about making fundamental changes. I was disappointed to find out that his voice was used in a bunch of "robocalls" endorsing a BCDO candidate the day before the primary.
This, after one got the impression that he would, at least, remain neutral in this "family squabble", is troubling.
From Frederick Douglass