The Left Marches On Part 4: “Asset Monetization” will fund Dag’s Vision

There is a bigger story here involving the sale of highways from border to border. Check out the law firms and the agenda of the money grabbers incl " Team Rudy" They want  TOLLS on Super highways and open borders from Mexico to Canada

I agree with Mr. Lonegan's assesment of the situation. He is able to look at the real picture here and see the writing on the wall.
Humbleservant has made a great observation and that is only the tip of the iceberg. Rudy's law firm is currently managing the contracts for Mexican construction firms working on the so called "Superslabs" currently being constructed in Texas with plans for more highways to criss-cross Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. Eventually leading up to the forming of the North American Union. Kiss your country goodbye if this happens as this is being planned now with eventual control by the U.N.. Corzine, I am sure, is very happy with this as his views seem to go parallel with this concept. I watched Corzine's state of the state speech where he used a term "For the common good" approximately 13 times...sounds like Ho Chi Minh, or Kam Jong Il to me...if he likes their ideals so much he should go live there.
Dag Hammarskjold, in Corzine's own words, was his boyhood hero, and the fact that he chooses to bring socialist ideas into a democratic society makes me sick.
Hey SJBLUE, open your eyes, there is not much that is more important to write about, and Steve has the stones to bring out the truth.
Eighteen states have already considered resolutions against the NAU, and 2 or 3 have passed them.
Corzine is playing with our lives and livelyhoods without our consent, and giving away the ranch, maybe he will take your property next for some section 8 housing..and give it away to someone less fortunate leaving you footing the bill.

...of the Right Wing. I do not think the US or NJ should be subject to "Global Law". While you have introduced this argument, as it has nothing to do with my or Lonegan's post, I'll simply say this. While Right Wingers consitantly argue that the USA is the greatest country in the world they also note that the US should only be judged as compared to the actions of other nations. However, those like myself who know that the USA is the greatest country in the world believe that because of that status we should hold ourselves to a higher caliber of action, and resume the moral leadership that we have lost. As far as flipping the bird goes the Bill of Rights does not protect obsenity, you can blame your conservative court for refusing to define what obsenity is. I could care less, but believe me it is Democrats who want to take away free speech and expression. Event the most ardent conservatives would agree.

It is indeed hillarious but sad that the advocates of the Adult entertainment industry on the left. would infringe the 1st amendment in such away. The first amendment protects most speech and expression, as long as you dont shout fire in a crowded theater. SJ Blue version of free speech protection is protecting  only the speech that he agrees with. Yes 21st Century Americans do hold themselves to a much higher standard expecially in battle, they put on uniforms and are forced to fight with ham strung modern versions of Marcus and Queensbury rules

To muddle my points with a weak ham-handed assault that basically reads "Liberals do not support the troops" is typical. Conservatives always do that. If you read my comments you will notice that I made no mention of combat servicemen and women. I like all Americans applaud and appreciate their service. I am impressed and grateful for their bravery, and would certainly agree that 99.999999999%of those who put on the uniform hold themselves with the utmost dignity and respect for themselves and for the world around them. I was speaking of the deplorable chicken-hawks that run the GOP and arm-chair conservatives that talk the talk but cant and have no desire to walk the walk. It is frustrating to have every debate between Dems and Reps to end with the Reps saying "You hate America, you don't support the troops". I do not simply feel that the only speech that needs protecting is the speech that I agree with. On the contrary I respect the right of anyone to say their opinions and I respect their right to scream it from the hilltops. However, there is no right to hate-speech. Speech that is designed specifically to demean others. Their is no right written or otherwise implied in the Constitution that gives anyone the right to impede on anothers right to "Life, Liberty, or Pursuit of Happiness"-to quote another of our famous founding documents.

It is not the Soldiers plan. If you dont think that Patrius' plan has been manipulated by chicken hawks in DC you need to get a shot of reality. This war is no Hollywood script with a proud general submitted a plan for victory to the President yearning for democracy and to liberate a defeated people. Chicken hawk consultants in the Defense Department put this plan together and unless Patrius follows the plan he gets canned. More and more qualified Generals have critized this plan and all of the former plans. I do support the men and women who serve, I simply do not support their mission. And no my position does not equate all speech with Hate Speech. Hate Speech has been clearly defind by the Courts and it is not and should not be protected under the first amendment, as yelling fire in a crowded movie theater is not. Your regurgitated insult that I do not support the troops and am a "friend of Saddam" is again ham-handed, thinly veiled, ignorant (the websters dictionary definition), and wrong.

Anyone is free to think any rediculous, racist, communist, dangerous...thing that they so choose. However, they do not have the right to impede upon the rights of others plain and simplr. Furthermore, the Courts have the Constitutional right to interpret the Constitution and have done so since very early in the Republic. I need no lessons in civics from you. I know how the process is supposed to work regarding war plans-I know who is supposed to develop the plans, I simply cant imagine that this Administration would let that happen. Remember the invastion of Iraq was scripted by the project for the New American Century's Neo-Cons years before Bush came into power. This administration has had its under and flat out unqualified minions involved with every department in DC, including: Health Policy, Emergency Management, Agriculture, Education, and specifically Homeland Security and Defense. I wish I could put the blinders on and believe what this entirely corrupt and incompetant administration did, I'm sure I'd be happier, but sadly I find it hard to ignore the obvious.