If actions speak louder than words, then whether Republican presidential nominee John McCain says he supports and/or opposes affirmative action is irrelevant.
Conservatives denounce the practice as promoting under-qualified or unprepared people ahead of more qualified alternatives just for the purpose of diversity. Yet that is exactly what McCain is doing with his choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate.
"It was rightly noted in Denver this week that Hillary left 18 million cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling in America," said Palin at a Saturday rally in Dayton, Ohio. "But thankfully, as it turns out, the women of America aren't finished yet, and the voters will shatter that glass ceiling once and for all."
Though the McCain campaign touts Palin as the answer for women eager to finally shatter the ultimate glass ceiling, nobody is arguing that she is the most-qualified person for the job -- not even her own mother-in-law.
"I'm not sure what she brings to the ticket other than she's a woman and a conservative," said Faye Palin. "Well, she's a better speaker than McCain."
By McCain's own logic, his vice presidential pick is "dangerously inexperienced" for the job, but Cindy McCain claimed on Sunday that Palin has national security experience because "Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia." No joke. I guess that kind of qualifies me to be governor of Pennsylvania.
Her religious fundamentalism and ideology aside, Palin appears to be a smart, tough and relatively accomplished politician. But she's no Kay Bailey Hutchison, Madeleine Albright, Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Dole or Olympia Snowe. And she's certainly no Hillary Clinton.
That's why this transparently political and superficial choice -- far from ready for prime time, yet literally a breath away from the presidency -- is an insult to voters who care about more than just paying lip service to women's rights.
In April of this year, McCain opposed the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which sought equal pay for women. He voted against an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act in 2000 which would "provide more effective remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex." And in 1994, he wrote and ushered through the Violence Against Women Act. No, wait -- that was Joe Biden.
McCain voted against requiring health insurance companies to cover birth control and against requiring that sex education be scientifically-accurate. He doesn't know if contraceptives prevent the spread of HIV. The list goes on and on.
There's nothing wrong with taking a risk when your campaign is in a rut, but trying to pass it off as advancing the plight of women is disingenuous and anything but straight talk.
Juan Melli is Politicker.com's associate editor.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog group that promotes ethics and accountability, has filed a complaint with the ... >
There's nothing more difficult to see than the history before your eyes. It sometimes takes generations to understand the significance of ... >
OK, he didn't say precisely that, but when the Chairman of the Budget Committee informs us that governmental spending is the key to prosperity, ... >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
The media, which loves headlines and knows little history, is trying to sell President Elect Obama as another Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But that ... >
When I was eleven, way back in 1965, my family was invited for Thanksgiving to my cousins’ cousins, a Jewish-Italian family who lived in the ... >
After the entire Star-Ledger editorial board opted to accept the paper's buyout offer, John Farmer, a 26-year veteran of the paper, was tasked ... >
A couple of weeks ago, my mother, Angelina Katz, did her second debate on behalf of Barack Obama. A debate? My mother? If you knew her, you’d be ... >
A rained out MusicFest this past September has provided Union County with $275,000 in insurance monies. The Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders ... >
Today the Asinine Watch begins. With so many illiterate statements made about the economy by elected officials in recent days and weeks, it was ... >
Palin's more qualified than Biden and Obama combined
What have they ever run?
Nothing.
Has either ever held a private sector job?
No.
Have either one done anything in their lives but collect a government paycheck?
Of course not.
The only thing these two are capable of doing is taking taxpayers to the cleaners, just like the Castro clone running New Jersey today.
And Palin's sharper than Hillary Clinton. You'll realize that when she wipes up the floor with Joe Biden.
Unsafe Pick
For a moment just forget about the fact that this woman is way to conservative for the average American. Also forget about the fact that she is a woman. What John McCain has done is put this country in jeopardy. If he is elected and should something happen to him ( certainly there is a better chance that he will not survive the next four years as compared to Abama)this " protector of the country" has put a novice in charge of our world affairs. I for one resent McCain for putting partisan politics before my safety. Not even the most ardent conservative republican can argue that this person is ready to step in and make decisions that will keep us and our children safe. It is not Palin who should be blamed , it is McCain. This is an unsafe pick in an unsafe world and McCain has shown that politics comes before safety.
VAWA Becoming a Liability for Biden
Biden's Unholy Alliance with Radical Feminism Coming to Light
Senator Joe Biden proudly proclaims that he was regularly and severely beaten by his older sister as a child and as an adolescent. This is the same sister that raised his two sons after his wife and daughter were killed in an auto accident.
Biden has often claimed that the Violence against Women Act is the greatest achievement of his career. He also claims that a woman cannot be a perpetrator of domestic violence, despite the fact that hundreds of studies show that women commit acts of domestic violence as often as, or more often than men. Many studies also show that lesbian women physically attack their intimate partners at least as often as heterosexual men.
As a result of Biden's Violence against Women Act, the federal government pays states to create laws effectively requiring that men be removed from their homes and families without even an allegation of violence, with no legitimate standards of evidence, when a woman makes a claim that she is afraid.
Elaine Epstein, president of the Massachusetts Bar Association (1999), has said "the facts have become irrelevant... restraining orders are granted to virtually all who apply. Regarding divorce cases, she states "allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage". According to Epstein, who is also a former president of the Massachusetts Women’s Bar Association, restraining orders are doled out "like candy" and "in virtually all cases, no notice, meaningful hearing, or impartial weighing of evidence is to be had."
State restraining order laws are starting to fall because they're unconstitutional. The federal law behind them, written by Joe Biden, is likely to fall as well, not because it isn’t popular, but because it is clearly unconstitutional.
Supporting Documentation
Here are some of the facts regarding Biden's abuse at the hand of his sister. During senate hearings held on December 11, 1990, Biden testified to the abuse.
www.ifeminists.net
This recent CDC study indicates that women between the ages of 18 and 28 initiate reciprocal violence against their intimate partners about as often as men. It also indicates that women initiate non-reciprocal violence against their intimate partners more than twice as often as men.
pn.psychiatryonline.org
Here is a link to a bibliography of over 200 studies indicating that women are as violent as men in their intimate relationships:
www.csulb.edu
According to the US Department of Justice, women also abuse, neglect and kill their children at significantly higher rates than men. Here’s some of the data on child homicides.
www.acf.hhs.gov
Research clearly indicates that lesbian battery is at least as common as heterosexual battery.
www.musc.edu/vawprevention
lesbianlife.about.com
Cathy Young reports on the Elaine Epstein quote and the broader issue at Salon.com here:
www.salon.com
and provides in depth analysis here:
www.iwf.org
Interesting
A former Mayor of a town of less than 7k people and Governor of a Alasaka.
And Mountaintop, as usual, your post contains an inaccuracy. Obama has worked in the privates sector, albeit for less than 5 years. In addition, while a Constitutional Law professor for 12 years at U of Chicago law can be considered public sector, it is not a position one gets on political merits to work in one of the most prestigious law schools in the nation.
I think anyone, regardless of party affiliation, would take a U.S. Senator, former state legislator and magna cum laude grad at Harvard Law school over someone with a journalism degree at the University of Idaho any day of the week.
Oh I forgot, according to Cindy McCain, Alaska is close to Russia giving her foreign policy experience.
New Jersey Restraining Orders
New Jersey's domestic violence statute has recently been found unconstitutional. The New Jersey Attorney General is taking this case to the state's Supreme Court.
The New Jersey Law Journal reports that Judge Richard Russell of Ocean City made the following remarks on tape during a judicial training session regarding the issuance of restraining orders.
(source – scan of print copy: www.fathersandhusbands.org/NJ_Rights_1.pdf)
“If I had one message to give you today, it is that your job is not to weigh the parties’ rights as you might be inclined to do as having been private practitioners. Your job is not to become concerned about all the constitutional rights of the man that you’re violating as you grant a restraining order. Throw him out on the street, give him the clothes on his back and tell him, ‘See ya’ around.’ “
A new municipal judge attending the training session stated “The statute says we should apply just cause in issuing the order.” “You seem to be saying to grant every order.” Russell quickly replied, “Yeah, that’s what I seem to be saying.”
The article is full of comments from Russell and his colleagues that are equally inflammatory.
Perhaps you think Russell should have been disbarred for instructing judges to ignore the constitution. In doing so, he violated his greatest responsibility as a judge in the most blatant way possible. Perhaps you think he should have gone to prison.
Russell now serves on the New Jersey Supreme Court's State Domestic Violence Working Group, the Executive Committee of the State Bar's Family Law Section, and the New Jersey Supreme Court's Family Practice Committee. He currently is the chair of the court's Child Support Subcommittee.
Given a recent ruling declaring New Jersey’s domestic violence statute unconstitutional and given the imminent Supreme Court challenge, the truth regarding the real practices that are being used to separate men from their children and their homes must be heard.
ON POINT
Domestic violence tangents aside (of course it's an important issue but can we stay with the thread of the post?), score is Melli 1, Mountaintop (predictably) zero.
You might think Palin is the greatest thing since sliced mooseburger but you cannot tell me she is the most qualified, tested person McCain could find. So he shows a lack of respect for the presidency and the process--not exactly strong leadership traits.
The GOP campaign is a lie. They say experience is important and the first chance they get to demonstrate it they go the other way. A 72-year-old man with cancer could pick someone with stronger creds. But that would be putting country first.
Melli's nonsense.
Governor Palin is no less "qualified" to be on the ticket than anyone else running in this year's contest.
Of the four candidates, only Palin has any executive experience as a mayor and governor.
What were Nancy Pelosi's qualifications to serve in the House? She never held any public office except for a failed bid to be chairman of the DNC in 1984!
What was Bill Bradley's qualifications when he ran for the US Senate in 1978? He never held public office and spent a decade playing professional basketball with the NY Knicks!
And since when is Kay Baily Hutchinson the "gold standard" for vice-presidential nominees as if Melli would have had anything good to say about her candidacy!
Melli has no institutional memory and fails to comprehend that picking a VP traditionally is about trying to win an election versus who is best to serve.
Is Melli willing to admit that if Palin is not qualified, that liberal Geraldine Ferraro and her six years in the HOR was the least qualified nominee of any major party ticket?
I sincerely doubt that kind of honesty is in him.
Vote Column A - All the way!
McCain's Choice is NOT Affirmative Action
What McCain did in selecting Governor Sarah Palin is the antithesis of affirmative action. Affirmative action programs call for recruitment and outreach to historically disadvantaged and underutilized women, minorities, persons with disabilities and veterans. I know. I ran a civil rights agency for nearly seven years. The law requires that persons benefiting from affirmative action be QUALIFIED for the job. The essence of affirmative action is opportunity, not giving an unqualified individual the job. Senators Hutchinson and Dole, to name two Republicans, would have been credible candidates. Not Palin, in my humble opinion. To learn about affirmative action, go to the US Department of Labor's website at www.dol.gov/esa/ofccp. Do your homework.
This selection was like George Bush senior selecting Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court. He was black, but hardly the best or even moderately qualified compared with all of the possible candidates, including African American jurists.
Re: McCain's Choice is NOT Affirmative Action
SJW: Thanks for your comments. I don't believe that what McCain did constitutes affirmative action at all. On the contrary, my point was that his actions are a manifestation of the conservative understanding of what affirmative action is:
"Conservatives denounce the practice as promoting under-qualified or unprepared people ahead of more qualified alternatives just for the purpose of diversity. Yet that is exactly what McCain is doing with his choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate."
When one doesn't understand the purpose of affirmative action, it's no surprise that we get people like Clarence Thomas and Alberto Gonzales in positions of power. While I disagree with their politics and wouldn't support their nominations, I agree that Senators Hutchinson or Dole would have been qualified candidates for the job.
Qualifications are in the eye of the beholder.
How does one truly assess qualifications?
Why are you discussing affirmative action and why is it relevant? Politics drives this decision, nothing more and nothing less.
Biden was the safe "political" choice. Palin is the out-of-the-box political choice.
Both choices designed to win a general election and nothing to do with practical governance.
Vote Column A - All the way!
Njpol08:McCains politically motivated split decision scares
John McCains politically motivated and calculated Sarah Palin split decision scares the BJesus out of me... And everyone that I've talked to or run into feels the same way: Democrats, Republicans and Independents! His VP choice is so utterly self serving, calculating, maniacal and reckless ...McCain debunks his own "Country First" campaign slogan...It's definitely not a sincere message. Actions speak louder than words!
Nj_politics_2008 I really appreciate your astute observations and remarks.
John McCain said tonight, "We face many threats in this dangerous world but I AM NOT AFRAID of THEM." OMG. And I believe him. Fear is informing and very focusing! A man without a healthy sense of fear is like a man without a sail. Totally lost and headed for disaster...And he wants to take us with him.
McCain has had four bouts with malignant melanoma. His father died at 62 and his grandfather at 71. And Sarah Palin is 44.
"I think anyone, regardless of party affiliation, would take a U.S. Senator, former state legislator and magna cum laude grad at Harvard Law school over someone with a journalism degree at the University of Idaho any day of the week.
Oh I forgot, according to Cindy McCain, Alaska is close to Russia giving her foreign policy experience.
Your Guy is Less Qualified than Our Girl
Consider the delicious irony in the Democrats’ sudden indignation that the GOP puts someone with (relatively) little experience in the second slot, when Obama represents the epitome of an affirmative action hire: a candidate with no discernable qualifications promoted from a field with vastly better credentials, based almost solely upon his race. If Melli’s assertion is that the GOP is hypocritical for considering sex, while the Democrats are not – because race, sex, sexual preference, and ethnic quotas are second nature to them – point taken. Clearly, Palin’s sex worked in her favor. But who are the Dems to complain? If qualifications meant anything to them, Richardson would be their candidate. Instead, they chose a rank rookie, perhaps the least qualified candidate since 1940. Decisions on VP candidates are, obviously, political, and if a candidate’s sex can help win an election, great. But Palin was chosen more for her policy positions than her sex. As a previous poster noted, was Clarence Thomas the “most qualified” candidate for the US Supreme Court? Every bit as much as was Thurgood Marshall. The difference being that our “affirmative action” hires are actually qualified. Marshall was an embarrassment; Thomas has been exemplary. Query where all these Dems were when Mondale chose Ferraro? Or, for that matter, when Kerry choose the manifestly underqualified Edwards? And on the merits of Melli’s legislation, he’s all wet. That Ledbetter legislation did NOT stand for equal pay; it stood for extending a statute of limitations indefinitely, such that an alleged discriminatory act made in 1970 could be used today against a company, as every paycheck since would be considered a continuing offense, a patently ridiculous proposal. McCain’s vote against “Paycheck Fairness” constitutes yet another wonderful reason to support him, as that proposal – better entitled the lawyer full employment act – assumes that the gap between male and female wages is based upon sex discrimination and involves the government in a lunatic “comparable worth” regime. Insurance mandates – like birth control – drive the costs of premiums further into the stratosphere, producing more uninsured, and creating calls from the same people who made the insurance unaffordable to urge nationalization. (Why is insurance covering nickel and dime expenses anyway?) Kathy walks in rare company, if everyone she knows agrees with her. And, actually, a Harvard degree tends to disqualify a candidate, until such graduate demonstrates that he learned humility while at Cambridge. Writing one’s autobiography at 35 and seeking the presidency when so manifestly unqualified constitute hubris, not humility. Obama’s a very bright guy, but he utterly lacks wisdom. A wise man understands that he’s too stupid to run everyone else’s lives, a thought which clearly never occurred to Obama. He might be a good candidate, when he grows up. But, if he did, he’d be a Republican, and Juan wouldn’t be caught dead supporting him.
I've been the workforce for
I've been the workforce for 20 years. I don't need anyone to tell me what affirmative action, and more importantly its fruit, is. If affirmation action is not discrimination, then it definitely breeds it. It's not what you know, it's what you look like and who you know that matters in New Jersey. Qualifications for far too many government-subsidized jobs don't mean diddly.