Richard Perr and Elia Pelios filed ethics complaints today against seven state legislators. The two Democratic County Chairmen alleged State Senators Joseph Kyrillos, Bob Singer and Peter Inverso, and Assemblymen Kevin O'Toole, David Wolfe, Christopher Connors and Rick Merkt may have profited by state budget items that supported. Democrats are alleging that a federal probe of how legislators might personally profit off specific state budget items is unfairly targeting just one party by looking only at actions since 2004, when Democrats first had complete control of both houses of the Legislature. "These complaints are nothing more than a pathetic attempt by the Democrat machine to divert attention away from the fact that a laundry list of Democrats is being investigated by the FBI and US Attorney for using their office to enrich themselves. By their own admission, their complaints lack any merit or substance," said GOP State Chairman Tom Wilson. "Their failure to provide a shred of evidence to support their claims demonstrates that this is nothing more than a couple of political bosses looking to sully the good names of honest legislators to help their campaigns. This shouldn’t surprise anyone, though, since Chairman Perr has a history of filing bogus complaints. The ethics committee will undoubtedly see this as yet another baseless, politically inspired stunt and dismiss it just as they have his past complaints."
RICHARD J. PERR, ESQUIRE
41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-795-1118
856-795-1110 (fax)
May 3, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (609-943-3557) and REGULAR MAIL
Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards c/o Albert Porroni, Legislative Counsel
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 068
Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Dear Mr. Porroni:
Please accept this letter as a formal ethics complaint against Assemblyman Christopher J. Connors pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law (N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 et seq.) and the Legislative Code of Ethics.
Pursuant to the Standard Operating Procedures of the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards, in order for an ethics complaint to be valid it must be commenced "within two years next after the conduct complained of occurred or within two years after it is discovered by the complainant with the exercise of reasonable diligence" (emphasis added.) Although the conduct alleged here occurred more than two years ago, it is nevertheless appropriate in this case for the Committee to review this complaint, as current events on Legislative conflicts gave me cause to review the relevant files and the information contained herein only recently came to light.
Based on financial disclosure forms, Assemblyman Connors' wife is employed by Ocean County, and his child by Lacey Township. Additional information also shows that Assemblyman Connors has, through his employment with the firm of Dasti, Murphy, McGuckin in Forked River, derived income from Little Egg Harbor Township as their municipal attorney. At least thirteen special budget grants, three of which were in the FY2000 Act, four of which were in the FY2001 Act, and six of which were in the FY2002 Act, were directed to the aforementioned communities from which Assemblyman Connors andlor his immediate family derived income.
Specifically, the grants that the Assemblyman may have advocated for are as follows:
FY2000
$45,000 - Ocean County Community College Camp Viking $40,000 -- Lacey Township - Gille Park Baseball Field
$100,000 - Little Egg Harbor Municipal Justice Complex Center
FY2001
$50,000 - Ocean County College Camp Viking
$90,000 - Lacey Township Recreation Improvements
$75,000 - Lacey Township - Gille Park Pavilion
$300,000 - Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) Language - Engineering and Design of Fischer Blvd. Extension
FY2002
$50,000 - Ocean County College Camp Viking
$30,000 - Ocean County College - NJ Coastal Communiversity
$300,000 - Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) Language - Engineering and Design of Fischer Blvd. Extension
$75,000 - Lacey Township Dredging Project
$55,000 - Ocean County Police Academy Police Memorial
$170,000 - Environmental Learning Center of Ocean County
Pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law, at N.J.S.A. 52:13D-18, "[n]o member of the Legislature shall participate by voting or any other action on the floor of the General Assembly or the Senate, or in committee or elsewhere, in the enactment or defeat of legislation in which he has a personal interest" unless it can be shown that "no benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to him, or a member of his immediate family, as a member of a business, profession, occupation or group, to any greater extent than any such benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to any other member of such business, profession, occupation or group."
Section 2:1 of the Legislative Code of Ethics further provides that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall...act in any way that impairs the objectivity or independence of judgment of the member of the Legislature in the exercise of his or her duties...or which creates a justifiable impression among the public that such trust is being violated."
Based on the information provided above, I respectfully request that the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards take jurisdiction of this matter to investigate whether Assemblyman Connors did advocate for and obtain these grants and therefore violated the New Jersey Conflict of Interest Law and the Code of Ethics.
Very truly yours,
<!--[if !vml]-->
<!--[endif]-->
<!--[if !vml]-->
<!--[endif]-->
Ella Pelios
RICHARD J. PERR, ESQUIRE
41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-795-1118
856-795-1110 (fax)
May 3, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (609-943-3557) and REGULAR MAIL
Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards c/o Albert Porroni, Legislative Counsel
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 068
Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Dear Mr. Porroni:
Please accept this letter as a formal ethics complaint against Assemblyman David Wolfe pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law (N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 et seq.) and the Legislative Code of Ethics.
Pursuant to the Standard Operating Procedures of the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards, in order for an ethics complaint to be valid it must be commenced "within two years next after the conduct complained of occurred or within two years after it is discovered by the complainant with the exercise of reasonable diligence" (emphasis added.) Although the conduct alleged here occurred more than two years ago, it is nevertheless appropriate in this case for the Committee to review this complaint, as current events on Legislative conflicts gave me cause to review the relevant files and the information contained herein only recently came to light.
Specifically, an article in the April 30, 2007 Bergen Record, detailing United States Attorney Chris Christie's probe into so-called "Christmas tree" grants doled out in the annual State budget process, highlighted two instances in which special funding was appropriated to entities closely tied to certain legislators who are not, as yet, subject to the federal probe. It is on the basis of the facts recited in that article that I have investigated the matter further and am filing this complaint.
Based on financial disclosure forms, Assemblyman Wolfe is employed by Ocean County College, and his wife has been employed by the organization Homes Now, Inc. At least five special budget grants, two of which were in the FY2000 Act, one of which was in the FY200I Act, and two of which were in the FY2002 Act, were directed to the aforementioned communities or entities from which Assemblyman Wolfe and/or his immediate family derived income.
Specifically, the grants that the Assemblyman may have advocated for are as follows:
FY2000
$500,000 -- Homes Now, Inc. - Brick Township Project $45,000 - Ocean County Community College - Camp Viking
FY2001
$50,000 - Ocean County College - Camp Viking
FY2002
$50,000 - Ocean County College - Camp Viking
$30,000 - Ocean County College w.. New Jersey Coastal Communiversity
The Conflicts of Interest Law, at N.J.S.A. 52:13D-18, states that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall participate by voting or any other action on the floor of the General Assembly or the Senate, or in committee or elsewhere, in the enactment or defeat of legislation in which he has a personal interest" unless it can be shown that "no benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to him, or a member of his immediate family, as a member of a business, profession, occupation or group, to any greater extent than any such benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to any other member of such business, profession, occupation or group."
Section 2:1 of the Legislative Code of Ethics further provides that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall...act in any way that impairs the objectivity or independence of judgment of the member of the Legislature in the exercise of his or her duties...or which creates a justifiable impression among the public that such trust is being violated."
<!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->
<!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]--> Very truly yours,<!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->Based on the information provided above, I respectfully request that the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards take jurisdiction of this matter to investigate whether Assemblyman Wolfe did advocate for and obtain these grants, and therefore violated the New Jersey Conflict of Interest Law and the Code of Ethics when he sought and obtained these grants.
RICHARD J. PERR, ESQUIRE
41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-795-1118
856-795-1110 (fax)
May 3, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (609-943-3557) and REGULAR MAIL
Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards c/o Albert Porroni, Legislative Counsel
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 068
Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Dear Mr. Porroni:
Please accept this letter as a formal ethics complaint against Senator Robert Singer pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law (N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 et seq.) and the Legislative Code of Ethics.
Pursuant to the Standard Operating Procedures of the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards, in order for an ethics complaint to be valid it must be commenced "within two years next after the conduct complained of occurred or within two years after it is discovered by the complainant with the exercise of reasonable diligence" (emphasis added.) Although the conduct alleged here occurred more than two years ago, it is nevertheless appropriate in this case for the Committee to review this complaint, as current events on Legislative conflicts gave me cause to review the relevant files and the information contained herein only recently came to light.
Specifically, an article in the April 30, 2007 Bergen Record, detailing United States Attorney Chris Christie's probe into so-called "Christmas tree" grants doled out in the annual State budget process, highlighted two instances in which special funding was appropriated to entities closely tied to certain legislators who are not, as yet, subject to the federal probe. It is on the basis of the facts recited in that article that I have investigated the matter further and am filing this complaint.
Based on financial disclosure forms, Senator Singer has been employed by Lakewood Township and Community/Kimball Medical Center. In addition, in 2005 Senator Singer was also the recipient of an honoraria from Kimball Medical Center. At least ten special budget grants, five of which were in the FY2000 Act, four of which were in the FY2001 Act, and one of which was in the FY2002 Act, were directed to the aforementioned communities or entities from which Senator Singer derived income.
Specifically, the grants that the Senator may have advocated for are as follows:
FY2000
$40,000 --- Lakewood Volunteer Fire Company - Defibrillators
$100,000 - Lakewood Township Recreational Fields Improvement $16,000 - Lakewood First Aid - Defibrillators
$85;000 - Kimball Medical Center's Assisted Living Facilities Bus Purchase $200,000 - Kimball Medical Center's Neighborhood Health Center
FY2001
$63,000 - Lakewood First Aid & Emergency, Inc.
$50,000 - Lakewood Fire Commissioners, District No. 1
$75,000 - Lakewood Township Municipal Building Elevator Renovation and Emergency Vehicle
$250,000 - Kimball Medical Center - Emergency Room Expansion
FY2002
$344,000 - Kimball Medical Center Lakewood - Emergency Services and Equipment
The Conflicts of Interest Law, at N.J.S.A. 52:13D-18, states that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall participate by voting or any other action on the floor of the General Assembly or the Senate, or in committee or elsewhere, in the enactment or defeat of legislation in which he has a personal interest" unless it can be shown that "no benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to him, or a member of his immediate family, as a member of a business, profession, occupation or group, to any greater extent than any such benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to any other member of such business, profession, occupation or group."
Section 2:1 of the Legislative Code of Ethics further provides that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall...act in any way that impairs the objectivity or independence of judgment of the member of the Legislature in the exercise of his or her duties...or which creates a justifiable impression among the public that such trust is being violated."
<!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->Based on the information provided above, I respectfully request that the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards take jurisdiction of this matter to investigate whether Senator Singer did advocate for and obtain these grants and therefore violated the New Jersey Conflict of Interest Law and the Code of Ethics when he sought and obtained these grants.
Very truly yours,
Elia Pelios
RICHARD J. PERR, ESQUIRE
41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-795-1118
856-795-1110 (fax)
May 3, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (609-943-3557) and REGULAR MAIL
Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards c/o Albert Porroni, Legislative Counsel
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 068
Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Dear Mr. Porroni:
Please accept this letter as a formal ethics complaint against Assemblyman Kevin O'Toole pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law (N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 et seq.) and the Legislative Code of Ethics.
Pursuant to the Standard Operating Procedures of the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards, in order for an ethics complaint to be valid it must be commenced "within two years next after the conduct complained of occurred or within two years after it is discovered by the complainant with the exercise of reasonable diligence" (emphasis added.) Although a portion of the conduct alleged here occurred more than two years ago, it is nevertheless appropriate in this case for the Committee to review this complaint, as current events on Legislative conflicts gave me cause to review the relevant files and the information contained herein only recently came to light.
Based on financial disclosure forms, Assemblyman O'Toole's wife is employed by Essex County. Several special budget grants in the FY2001 and FY2002 Acts were directed to Essex County, from which Assemblyman O'Toole's immediate family derives income.
Specifically, the grants that the Assemblyman may have advocated for are as follows:
FY2001
$950,000 - Essex County - Hilltop Parkland Improvements/Maintenance $950,000 - Essex County - Parkland Improvements/Maintenance
FY2002
$5,000,000 - Special Aid to Essex County
Very truly yours,
Elia Pelios <!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->Pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law, at N.J.S.A. 52:13D-18, "[n]o member of the Legislature shall participate by voting or any other action on the floor of the General Assembly or the Senate, or in committee or elsewhere, in the enactment or defeat of legislation in which he has a personal interest" unless it can be shown that "no benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to him, or a member of his immediate family, as a member of a business, profession, occupation or group, to any greater extent than any such benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to any other member of such business, profession, occupation or group."
Section 2:1 of the Legislative Code of Ethics further provides that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall...act in any way that impairs the objectivity or independence of judgment of the member of the Legislature in the exercise of his or her duties...or which creates a justifiable impression among the public that such trust is being violated."
Based on the information provided above, I respectfully request that the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards take jurisdiction of this matter to investigate whether Assemblyman O'Toole did advocate for and obtain the grants which were directed to the county, and therefore violated the New Jersey Conflict of Interest Law and the Code of Ethics.
RICHARD J. PERR, ESQUIRE
41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-795-1118
856-795-1110 (fax)
May 3, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (609-943-3557) and REGULAR MAIL
Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards c/o Albert Porroni, Legislative Counsel
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 068
Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Dear Mr. Porroni:
Please accept this letter as a formal ethics complaint against Senator Joseph Kyrillos pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law (N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 et seq.) and the Legislative Code of Ethics.
Pursuant to the Standard Operating Procedures of the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards, in order for an ethics complaint to be valid it must be commenced "within two years next after the conduct complained of occurred or within two years after it is discovered by the complainant with the exercise of reasonable diligence" (emphasis added.) Although some of the conduct alleged here occurred more than two years ago, it is nevertheless appropriate in this case for the Committee to review this complaint, as current events on Legislative conflicts gave me cause to review the relevant files and the information contained herein only recently came to light.
Based on financial disclosure forms, Senator Kyrillos' wife is employed by Monmouth University. Additionally, Senator Kyrillos serves on the boards of Bayshore Senior Day Center, Count Basie Theater, Newark Do Something, the New Jersey Historical Society, Prevention First of Oakhurst, NJ, and the Monmouth County Historical Association, and his wife is on the board of Monmouth Medical Center.
At least eighteen special budget grants, six of which were in the FY2000 Act, seven of which were in the FY2001 Act, four of which were in the FY2002 Act, and one of which was in the FY2005 Act, were directed to the entities from which Senator Kyrillos and/or his immediate family derived income, or served in a trusteeship capacity.
Specifically, the grants that the Senator may have advocated for are as follows:
FY2000
$5,000 - Monmouth University - Program for Acceleration in Computer Science for Minority Students
$1,200,000 -- New Jersey Historical Society relocation
$100,000 - Family Health Center at Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch $50,000 - Bayshore Senior Center
$100,000 - Monmouth County Historical Association, Taylor-Butler House Capital Improvement
$100,000 - Monmouth Medical Center -- AWARE
FY2001
$50,000 - Bayshore Senior Center
$100,000 - Monmouth County Historical Association, Taylor-Butler House Capital Improvement
$100,000 - Newark Do Something
$110,000 - Count Basie Theater
$100,000 - Monmouth Medical Center -- AWARE
$5,000 - Monmouth University - Program for Acceleration in Computer Science Careers
$3,500,000 - Monmouth University Multi-purpose Regional Activity Center
FY2002
$100,000 - Monmouth Medical Center -- AWARE
$100,000 - Newark Do Something
$1,500,000 - Monmouth University Multi-purpose Regional Activity Center $20,000 - Prevention First Monmouth County
F Y2005
$90,000 - Monmouth University Nursing Camp Grant
Pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law, at N.J.S.A. 52:13D-18, " [n]o member of the Legislature shall participate by voting or any other action on the floor of the General Assembly or the Senate, or in committee or elsewhere, in the enactment or defeat of legislation in which he has a personal interest" unless it can be shown that "no benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to him, or a member of his immediate family, as a member of a business, profession, occupation or group, to any greater extent than any such benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to any other member of such business, profession, occupation or group."
Section 2:1 of the Legislative Code of Ethics further provides that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall...act in any way that impairs the objectivity or independence of judgment of the member of the Legislature in the exercise of his or her duties...or which creates a justifiable impression among the public that such trust is being violated."
Based on the information provided above, I respectfully request that the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards take jurisdiction of this matter to investigate whether Senator Kyrillos did advocate for and obtain these grants, and therefore violated the New Jersey Conflict of Interest Law and the Code of Ethics.
Very truly yours,
<!--[if !vml]-->
<!--[endif]-->
<!--[if !vml]-->
<!--[endif]-->
Elia Pelios
RICHARD J. PERR, ESQUIRE
41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-795-1118
856-795-11 10 (fax)
May 3, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (609-943-3557) and REGULAR MAIL
Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards c/o Albert Porroni, Legislative Counsel
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 068
Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Dear Mr. Porroni:
Please accept this letter as a formal ethics complaint against Assemblyman Richard A. Merkt pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law (N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 et seq.) and the Legislative Code of Ethics.
Pursuant to the Standard Operating Procedures of the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards, in order for an ethics complaint to be valid it must be commenced "within two years next after the conduct complained of occurred or within two years after it is discovered by the complainant with the exercise of reasonable diligence" (emphasis added.). Although the conduct alleged here occurred more than two years ago, it is nevertheless appropriate in this case for the Committee to review this complaint, as current events on Legislative conflicts gave me cause to review the relevant files and the information contained herein only recently came to light.
As indicated in financial disclosure statements, Assemblyman Merkt is employed by Fairleigh Dickinson University. In F2002, the Fairleigh Dickinson University Distance Learning Institute received a special grant of $3,900,000 which the Assemblyman may have advocated for.
In addition, Assemblyman Merkt, while serving on the Board of the Morris Center YMCA, may also have advocated for and obtained special appropriations in FY2002 of $100,000 for that entity's Child Care Facility. (This grant was ultimately reduced to $50,000 by the Governor's line-item veto, but the Appropriations bill that was approved by the Legislature allocated the original amount of $100,000.)
The New Jersey Conflicts of Interest Law, at N.J.S.A. 52:13D-18, provides in pertinent part:
"[n]o member of the Legislature shall participate by voting or any other action on the floor of the General Assembly or the Senate, or in committee or elsewhere, in the enactment or defeat of legislation in which he has a personal interest" unless it can be shown that "no benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to him, or a member of his immediate family, as a member of a business, profession, occupation or group, to any greater extent than any such benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to any other member of such business, profession, occupation or group."
Section 2:1 of the Legislative Code of Ethics further provides that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall...act in any way that impairs the objectivity or independence of judgment of the member of the Legislature in the exercise of his or her duties...or which creates a justifiable impression among the public that such trust is being violated."
Based on the information above, I respectfully request that the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards take jurisdiction of this matter to investigate whether Assemblyman Merkt did advocate for and obtain these grants, and therefore violated the New Jersey Conflict of Interest Law and the Code of Ethics.
<!--[if !vml]-->
<!--[endif]-->
RICHARD J. PERR, ESQUIRE
41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-795-1118
856-795-1110 (fax)
May 3, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (609-943-3557) and REGULAR MAIL
Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards c/o Albert Porroni, Legislative Counsel
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 068
Trenton, NJ 08625-0068
Dear Mr. Porroni:
PIease accept this letter as a formal ethics complaint against Senator Peter Inverso pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law (N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 et seq.) and the Legislative Code of Ethics.
Pursuant to the Standard Operating Procedures of the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards, in order for an ethics complaint to be valid it must be commenced "within two years next after the conduct complained of occurred or within two years after it is discovered by the complainant with the exercise of reasonable diligence" (emphasis added.) Although most of the conduct alleged here occurred more than two years ago, it is nevertheless appropriate in this case for the Committee to review this complaint, as current events on Legislative conflicts gave me cause to review the relevant files and the information contained herein only recently came to light.
Based on financial disclosure forms, Senator Inverso serves on the boards of Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at Hamilton, Rider University, and Project Freedom in Washington Township. At least three special budget grants, one of which was in the FY2001 Act, and two of which were in the FY2002 Act, were directed to the entities from which Assemblyman Inverso served in a trusteeship capacity.
Additionally, as a June 25, 2000 Philadelphia Inquirer article reported, a $20,000 grant was directed to a nonprofit organization called Mission Kindness International. Those funds "went largely to pay the salary" of Senator Inverso's cousin, Andrea Inverso, who headed the organization.
Specifically, the grants that the Senator may have advocated for are as follows:
FY2001
$15,000 - Project Freedom
FY2002
$25,000 - RWJ University Hospital at Hamilton - Grounds for Healing Project $500,000 - Rider University Sports and Recreational Facility
Pursuant to the Conflicts of Interest Law, at N.J.S.A. 52:13D-18, "[n]o member of the Legislature shall participate by voting or any other action on the floor of the General Assembly or the Senate, or in committee or elsewhere, in the enactment or defeat of legislation in which he has a personal interest" unless it can be shown that "no benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to him, or a member of his immediate family, as a member of a business, profession, occupation or group, to any greater extent than any such benefit or detriment could reasonably be expected to accrue to any other member of such business, profession, occupation or group."
Section 2:1 of the Legislative Code of Ethics further provides that "[n]o member of the Legislature shall...act in any way that impairs the objectivity or independence of judgment of the member of the Legislature in the exercise of his or her duties...or which creates a justifiable impression among the public that such trust is being violated."
Based on the information provided above, I respectfully request that the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards take jurisdiction of this matter to investigate whether Senator Inverso did advocate for and obtain these grants, and therefore violated the New Jersey Conflict of Interest Law and the Code of Ethics.
Very truly yours,
<!--[if !vml]-->
<!--[endif]-->
<!--[if !vml]-->
<!--[endif]-->
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]-->
Twelve New Jersey legislators, all from districts that are not especially competitive in general election contests, face potential obstacles in their ... >
It's hard to not be concerned these days. We've all witnessed frustration with our institutions before but I never remember anything of this ... >
Instead of borrowing trillions to waste on make-work governmental projects, stimulate the economy with tax cuts. >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
In December 2008, the Holy See released a new document dealing with bioethics called “Dignitas Personae.” This “instruction” from the ... >
Hard to believe we have arrived at the last year of the first decade of the 21st century. Boy, seems like it was just yesterday that Bush was handed ... >
It's actually come to this: A panel convened by the legislature of the State of New Jersey has concluded that discrimination is not good. Maybe ... >
As it tends to, history seems to be repeating itself as 240 laid-off workers at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago revive a decades old tactic -- ... >
Many columnists write a "year in review" or a "predictions" piece for the New Year, however I decided to refrain from going down ... >
Five Democrat governors including New Jersey’s Jon Corzine and New York’s David Paterson have called upon the incoming Obama administration to ... >
Phony Attack against O'Toole
O'Toole voted AGAINST the 2002 budget that included all that money for Essex County. Look it up.
Interesting Reading
Interesting reading, but doesn't exactly rise to the level of no-show jobs and getting the people of the State of New Jersey to pay your alimony to your ex-wife.
Little Stretch
Not sure how OToole getting grants for parks and aid for the taxpayers of Essex benefited his wife as an individual in her job at Essex County, was she slated to be laid off if the aid didn’t come? - I lump that right in with Coniglio who gave a private hospital that benefits 0 taxpayers money and then got himself a 60k consulting job - I really see the similarities (not)
Dems Desperate
The Democrats are going to lose seats in both houses of the legislature no matter how incompetent the Republicans have become. The Democrat Party has become a poster child for all that is wrong with government. Where's the tax relief? This legislature can't get out of it's own way.
Laughable
By far my top 3 items these hacks are protesting:
1) $55,000 - Ocean County Police Academy Police Memorial
2) $40,000 -Lakewood Volunteer Fire Company –Defibrillators
3) $50,000 - Bayshore Senior Center
"Screw policemen, screw firemen (and people with heart attacks) and screw seniors!!!"
- Maybe the Democrats new rallying cry?
Joke of the week
Don't see any Bergen $$$ there, so much for district 40
New GOP rallying cry...
"Our self serving pols are getting less than your than your self-serving pols."
I do not see anyone defending Bryant. When will we all realize that it is the system itself. We need new blood at all levels.
Put the GOP back in power and faster than Peter Biondi can pass along a racist/sexist "joke" Republican lawmakers will be lining their pockets at the taxpayers' expense.
SomersetDem
I think we need term limits badly, at all levels of government. The longer any of these guys are in power, the more likely they start to dip.
Plagiarism?
Funny - looks suspiciously like my complaing naming Louis Greenwald and his relationship with Remington and Vernick, except that I was able to provide 14 pages of fact and supporting documentation.
Merkt? You idiots.
The complaint (baseless) just about sums it up. 1. Merkt never gave money to Fairleigh Rediculous. 2. He might have given money to a Morris County YMCA, but he was a volunteer there -- oooooo scandal... imagine that... a republican volunteering with a good group! Got him! This is part of democrats' feeble attempts to shut people up like Merkt who have been bashing this kind of pork for years. Trash from Trenton think this will stop people like Merkt from exposing people like Wayne Bryant, Brian Stack, and "Doh" Coniglio? You just guaranteed Merkt will start digging deeper to check on people like Codey to see if he was lying when he ran around trying to blame bureaucrats when he directed that homeland security money be given out as as pork and allowed the creation of a fake homeland secutiy application process where hundreds of police chiefs , firemen, and first-aid responders (shortly after 9-11) had their time wasted for politics. The trash in Trenton don't just use pork to enrich themselves, they play games with public safety right after thousands died in a terrorist attack -- and with all their petty annoying theft, this is the biggest crime of all that they committed.
Exactly
"He might have given money to a Morris County YMCA, but he was a volunteer there -- oooooo scandal... imagine that... a republican volunteering with a good group! Got him!"
Exactly, they look rediculous attacking republicans for supporting volunteer fire departments, childrens camps, colleges, senior centers, and YMCAs. they think supporting these things is a scandal! this shows how stupid and out of touch these democrats are! they think there is nothing wrong with what McGreedy or the Torch or Wayne Bryan or John Lynch did, but they go after us for helping children and seniors!!! its hysterical
Christie is Partisan
If you don't have time to look at the multiple ethics complaints charges above, just take a look at the ones against Sen. Kyrillos; the connections to grants given to his wife's employers tally in the millions, including the New Jersey Historical Society and the Bay Shore Senior Center.
Now consider the ethics complaints filed by Chris Christie against Paul Sarlo and other Democratic legislators. I ask any fair-minded Republican to tell me what the heck the difference is between the two. The question here is whether pork, or superfluous budget items given because of political connections, are at stake and whether someone connected with a politician personally benefitted from the distribution of said grants.
Why is Chris Christie giving out these subpoenas now (pork isn't good, but can you imagine giving out these type of subpoenas on the federal level?), why hasn't he given them to Republicans who have done the same thing, and does this have anything to do with the November 2007 elections? By the way, it has been 7 months since Christie handed out the subpoenas to the rental property connected with Sen. Menendez; he did so two months before a major national election, and there have been absolutely no charges filed or brought to fruition against Menendez.
There is a difference between an arm of the judicial system using his office to catch and punish corrupt politicians versus using that same office for partisan politican gain. I'm concerned that Christie has trended towards the latter and is compromised as a prosecutor by his political allegiance.
MartinOne
MartinOne is right, release John Lynch and drop all charges against Wayne Bryant Christie! Only when corrupt democrats go free can justice be served. I can't wait to see Kyrillos rot in jail for supporting a senior center. How dare he.
SomersetDem, You have my
SomersetDem, You have my ear. I too think we need new blood at all levels. Perhaps you can work to run primaries with a new team of legislators on your side and new set of legislators on my side all running on "Term Limits." Elect us and we will give you a Term Limit Bill for the legislature. 8 years, and if it is in the middle of a 4 year Senate term, then the Senator must vacate the seat. We both know the system is designed to corrupt but we'll never get the ruling class on board. At least my Republican's run primary races. You party need some activists working the membership. Republican Conscience
A FEW COMMENTS
MartinOne -- "Why is Chris Christie giving out these subpoenas now"
Maybe he was just able to dig up the necessary information to justify the subpoenas? He HAS prosecuted many Republicans in the past, and the Democrats HAVE been in power in Trenton for a long time...which in NJ always translates to corruption of some kind.
I ask you...why are the Democrats sending out these ethics complaints now? Hummm...could it be for political reasons? Na, I'll just take them at face value.
Also, even if the above complaints were valid, most of them are based upon conduct from over two years ago which, by law, is too long a time to wait before filing a complaint.
Again, given the above, this could NEVER be for political reasons.
Nice Spin NJdems are corrupt, but lacks substance
Sure, use what the obvious response would be, "how dare he support a senior center."  Well Mayor/Assemblyman Brian Stack is under investigation for having funding directed toward his wife's day care center. I guess I could say, how dare he support a center for children. Yet I know as a dem I would be wrong. Corruption is wrong, regardless of party and MartinOne is correct. Justice should be blind. Lynch got what he deserved and Bryant will answer to his deeds, as should Kyrillos. When it comes to corruption it hurts all New Jerseyians. You should consider supporting prosecution of all political officials that are corrupt, because it usually only benefits the individuals involved, and lacks the concern for the people that they are elected to represent. I am a democrat and I support eliminating corruption in my party as well as other parties in our state.  Never put your political party before your country or state.  Â
DAY CARE CENTER
Sure Politically Free, it's just a day care center but how about telling everyone that the small park in back of the day care center can only be reached by going through the day care center. It's also fenced on the outside. It has NO ENTRANCE for the general public, who helped pay for it.
Karlcat
I have no idea what you are talking about. The example was used to illustrate that spin can be applied to any situation. My main point is corruption should not be tolerated from anyone. By the way if your details about the day care center are true, then Assemblyman Stack should join another well known Hudson County Democrat that is currently in federal prison. You have no arguement from me about the misdeeds of politicians, only an arguement for prosecution on both sides of the aisle
all the world is a playground
seems to me karlcat is implying the playground for Stack's wife's daycare center was possibly paid for by green acres or other preservation funds which is taxpayer money. Perhaps creating some greenery with public funds and then fencing it off from the public runs a little counterintuitive to the concept of "open" space.
PoliticallyFree
PoliticallyFree, would you vote for Bob the Torch or Jim McGreevey if they ran again?