By Donald Scarinci | March 12th, 2014 - 9:25am
| More

Asserting the right to remain silent does not imply guilt.

The courts will soon consider whether key witnesses in “Bridgegate,” including Bridget Anne Kelly and William Stepien were correct to assert their Fifth Amendment rights in response to subpoenas from the legislative committee investigating the George Washington Bridge lane closure.

 Everyone thinks that everyone else understands how closing lanes on the George Washington Bridge could be criminal.  The fact is that few people understand it including those who did it.  When someone is investigated for allegedly committing a crime they don’t understand, asserting the Fifth Amendment privilege is the only intelligent thing to do.

The U.S. Constitution sets forth the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. It states simply: “[No person]…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” The founding fathers generally contemplated more simple crimes like theft or murder.  Complex conceptual crimes like, “theft of honest services,” or “RICO conspiracy,” did not exist in 1787. 

The Fifth Amendment typically arises in the course of a criminal trial. In essence, defendants cannot be forced to testify against their will and juries cannot infer that they are guilty based on their unwillingness to take the stand. Witnesses can also assert their right against self-incrimination in civil and administrative proceedings if their testimony might later subject them to criminal charges.

In this case, the scope of the legislative investigation committee is rather broad and it is not clear exactly what “crime” they are investigating.  If there is an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office involving some unspecifiable crime, it would seem like pleading the Fifth Amendment might be the only thing a witness could do until the “crime” being investigated becomes more focused and more tangible.  At that point a more informed decision about testifying could be made.

The “gate” in “Bridgegate” is the opening that has brought many other questionable activities to light.  The criminal nature of some of these activities appear much more clear than closing lanes on a bridge.  If the “Bridgegate” players provide information that implicates them in any of these possible crimes, then they would have no choice but to assert the Fifth at this stage in the investigations.

Donald Scarinci is a managing partner at Lyndhurst, N.J. based law firm Scarinci Hollenbeck.  He is also the editor of the Constitutional Law Reporter and Government and Law blogs.

Wake-Up Call

Morning Digest: July 30th

  With looming deadline on bail reform, Christie calls Legislature into special session TRENTON - Gov. Chris Christie is calling the legislature into special session Thursday to address recent bail reform legislation before a looming deadline next week, according to a letter from the governor’s office today. (Brush/PolitickerNJ)...


The health of New Jersey's women is not Chris Christie's priority

By Linda Stender At his most recent town hall, Gov. Chris Christie accused his predecessors of "monkeying with the math" when it comes to their handling of our state's economy. But as the old saying goes, when the governor points a finger, he... Read More >


(7-30-14) Who Is Best Equipped to Decide the Fate of the Common Core? - The latest Christie controversy surrounds his Executive Order to revamp the state’s academic... more »
 The following letter was sent today to Republican state legislators, county chairs, state committee members, and New Hampshire... more »
The Perry-Paul Debate is Healthy for the GOP – and for America  The foreign policy debate in the media between prospective GOP Presidential candidates Texas Governor Rick Perry and... more »
(Washington DC)-- Two recent votes on Capitol Hill suggest an overdue and radical departure from our nation's Draconian and costly War on Drugs.  It's a long-overdue discussion (and not just... more »

Quote of the Day

quote of the day

"Assembly Speaker Vincent Prieto, a Hudson County Democrat, is balking. He claimed Tuesday that members of his caucus are divided over the measure and that his house is in no real rush – besides, even if enacted this year, the reforms would not take effect until 2017, he said. And with the growing belief that Christie could skip town to run for president, some Democrats are not eager to give him another talking point for his résumé. Christie’s plans to stump for Republican candidates in New Hampshire later Thursday only fuel that suspicion." - columnist Charles Stile

- The Bergen Record


Who's right on the bail reform special session?:


Visit the page for links to the best collection of information on New Jersey state government.


  • Polls
  • The best blogs
  • Columnists
  • State election results
  • Assembly election results
  • Local party websites
  • And more.