The U.S. Supreme Court is not expected to issue rulings in the same-sex marriage cases until June 2013. However, a new study suggests that how the justices act during oral arguments could tip off how the justices will ultimately rule.
Research conducted at the University of Arkansas found that the Supreme Court justices are more likely to interrupt and question lawyers for the side with which they disagree. The Supreme Court study examined 11 cases from the 2009 and 2010 terms and compared the voting records of eight justices with the number of interruptions they made.
In total, the researchers observed approximately 140 interruptions per case. However, during oral arguments for controversial cases such as Citizen’s United, the number of interruptions spike to 178. The interruptions also often correlated with the justices’ final votes on the issue, with justices more inclined to interrupt counsel of the side they will vote against.
The researchers also detected differenced among the justices. For instance, the pattern was less visible when examining the interruptions of Justice Antonin Scalia. He was the most vocal during the cases studied and questioned both sides with almost equal frequency. Meanwhile, Chief Justice John Roberts’ interruptions more clearly revealed his take on the issue. "On every single case, he exhibited the hypothesized behavior indicating that his interruptions, as well as his statements and questioning, were highly predictive of his intended vote," the study notes.
“The role of oral argument isn’t necessarily what we think it is. It’s really an opportunity for the justices to get the other justices on their side,” said political science professor William Schreckhise, who worked on the study. “This shows that justices come to the bench in individual cases with a pre-set idea of what they think is the right answer and would like to convince the other justices of what they think.”
Although the oral arguments will not be televised, the Supreme Court does make audio recordings and transcripts available to the public. The transcripts of oral arguments are provided to the public for free on the Supreme Court website. They are generally available on the same day an argument is heard by the Court. Since 2010, audio recordings have also been made available on the website. The audio recordings are posted on Fridays at the end of each argument week.
Therefore, those who give credence to the study can listen to the recordings of the same-sex marriage oral arguments and may be the first to know how the Court will decide the historic cases.
The Bergen County Prosecutor’s office has served subpoenas to Bergen County, Hackensack and North Arlington seeking information about the employment of public relations consultant Thomas Ammirato, who works for all three government entities, according to a report in the Bergen Record.Read More >
Days Since Last Christie Press Conference (Jan. 9)
Fired Chris Christie staffer isn’t ‘someone running away,’ attorney says TRENTON – Fired Gov. Chris Christie staffer Bridget Anne Kelly appeared to be fighting back tears outside of the Trenton courthouse Tuesday. The former deputy chief of staff who’s widely considered to the author of the infamous “time...
BY JEFF BRINDLE Anytime now, the U.S. Supreme Court will render a decision in McCutcheon v. FEC. And while reformists may not like it, the high court is likely to allow national parties to raise far more money. That could strengthen them... Read More >
"It sounds like Councilman Baraka is talking about regionalization similar to what happened to the Camden Police Department. Clearly, if you regionalize, there is going to be a layoff of Newark workers. We cant afford to have more cops laid off right now. During Mr. Baraka's time on the council, the city laid off about 170 cops, when has led to our streets being much more dangerous than they need to be." - Newark Mayoral candidate Shavar Jeffries, the former state Assistant Attorney General, referring to the disbandment of the South Jersey police force.- PolitickerNJ.com
Press releases are submitted by PolitickerNJ users, not by staff. They do not represent the viewpoint of PolitickerNJ.com.