By Donald Scarinci | November 28th, 2012 - 11:37am
| More

A constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and abolish the “super pac” has begun.  The super pac can accept unlimited personal and corporate campaign contributions and accounted for almost a Billion dollars that was spent in this years elections.

Voters in Montana and Colorado have voiced their displeasure with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The decision gave rise to the “Super PAC” after holding that the First Amendment does not allow political speech restrictions simply based on a speaker’s corporate identity. 

Montana’s Initiative 166 passed overwhelmingly with 75% of the vote. It states that “the people of Montana regard money as property, not speech.” It further adds that Montanans “intend that there should be a level playing field in campaign spending that allows all individuals, regardless of wealth, to express their views to one another and their government.” It directs the state congressional delegation to propose an amendment establishing that “corporations are not human beings with constitutional rights.

When the Supreme Court issues a decision, it must be followed in every state. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, lower courts are obligated to follow the precedent of the Supreme Court, regardless of whether they believe the justices got the decision right. Supreme Court justices are also bound to honor decisions issued by their predecessors, although the doctrine is arguably a bit flexible in this case.

A decision of the Supreme Court is considered the law of the land and is not easily overturned.  There are only two ways to do it--either wait for the Supreme Court to overturn its own decision, or amend the United States Constitution. 

While there are ways to overturn a Supreme Court decision, it is certainly not easy. One method is to wait for the Supreme Court to reconsider the issue and essentially overrule itself. Brown v. Board of Education is a classic example. The Court overruled the precedent established in 1896 in Plessy v. Ferguson, which held that segregated public facilities were constitutional so long as the black and white facilities were equal. The Court may again reverse course this term when it issues its decision on affirmative action. However, these cases are few and far between, and a significant amount of time generally passes between decisions.

The other option is to amend the Constitution, which is also an arduous task. It requires two-thirds of each chamber of Congress and three-fourths of the states must approve the change. While this may appear daunting, twenty-four U.S. senators and 75 U.S. representatives have introduced or co-sponsored legislation to overturn Citizens United. In addition, eleven states have formally called for an amendment, according to The Reporter.

Critics of Citizens United clearly still have work to do. However, history proves that it can be done. Four of the twenty-seven amendments to the Constitution, including the Fourteenth Amendment, have overturned Supreme Court decision.

 

Donald Scarinci is a managing partner at Lyndhurst, N.J.-based law firm Scarinci Hollenbeck.  He is also the editor of the Constitutional Law Reporter and Government & Law blogs.

 

The Back Room

National progressive group backs Watson Coleman in CD12

The Progressive Democrats of America Co-Founder and National Director Tim Carpenter and State Chair Mary Ellen Marino today endorsed Bonnie Watson Coleman for the Democratic nomination in the 12thCongressional District.

Read More >

Wake-Up Call

Morning Digest: April 24, 2014

Organization to honor Gov. KeanAn event next month for Community Options, Inc. will celebrate the 25th Anniversary of the organization's founding and honor Governor Tom Kean, Sr., a was an advocate over 25 years ago for bringing individuals with developmental disabilities out of state institutions into small group homes.Robert...

Op-Ed

How the City of Paterson became a city in crisis

By HAYTHAM YOUNES As the May 13th election for Paterson officials nears, I've noticed a lot of candidates running using slogans and empty promises as if they weren't around watching Paterson get to where it's at today. I think it's important that... Read More >

Contributors

(4-23-14) Bridgegate Witnesses Not "RATS" if Testimony is Forced -Superior Court Judge Mary Jacobson’s decision last week was covered in most newspapers and blogs as an affirmation of the... more »
(Absecon Island, NJ) --With his shocking win in last year's election, Atlantic City Mayor Don Guardian emerged as one of the most intriguing figures in the New Jersey political... more »
When it comes to profiling Christie, facts are for wussies (4/10/14) - As the national media stories on our Guv pile up, expect more blunders about the Garden State.... more »
This week I begin a series called Dispatches from Somewhere Else. Based on my on-going experiences as an everyman in New Jersey politics, these Dispatches review the hollowness of... more »

Quote of the Day

Quote of the day

"This is the only Tea Party group that endorsed Mitt Romney. These guys are the Vichy French of the Tea Party movement. They're the guys who say 'Viva la France,' and then you can't find them when the fighting starts. Come on." - GOP strategist Rick Shaftan, on the Independence Hall Tea Party group.

- PolitickerNJ.com

Poll

Who would you back for Governor of NJ in this 2017 general election dream match-up?:

Resources

Visit the PolitickerNJ.com/resources page for links to the best collection of information on New Jersey state government.

 

  • Polls
  • The best blogs
  • Columnists
  • State election results
  • Assembly election results
  • Local party websites
  • And more.

PolitickerNJ.com/resources