Election coverage on television seems to focus more on horserace polls and opinions than on the positions candidates have on issues. In NJ, some newspapers were hoping to enjoin a New Jersey Supreme Court ruling that prohibits the media from interviewing and photographing voters within 100 feet of the polls on Election Day.
The New Jersey Press Association argued that the ban thwarts its members’ ability to provide comprehensive election coverage and violates their First Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. However, Federal District Judge Joel A. Pisano recently ruled that the ban should remain intact, at least through the current election.
In his ruling, Pisano concluded that New Jersey’s prohibition against all expressive activities in the 100-foot zone, including exit polling, distributing voters’ rights cards, and photographing voters, was content neutral and seeks to protect the integrity of the election process. “Voters are entitled and have a right to a free, unfettered, unrestricted path to and from a polling place,” he said. Pisano also noted that he was fearful of causing a “fire drill” by changing the rules so late in the election season.
While New Jersey laws on exit polling are up for debate, the ban on electioneering is clearly established under New Jersey law. Activities such as obstructing, soliciting, and interfering with a voter, as well as electioneering and loitering, are prohibited within 100 feet of a polling place. Another provision of New Jersey’s election law makes it a criminal offense to distribute or display any circular or printed matter or offer any suggestion or solicit any support for any candidate, party or public question within the polling place or room or within a distance of one hundred feet of a polling place.
While this case may seem like a blow to the First Amendment, it really does nothing to hurt the newspapers that want to interview people at the polling places. Reporters have the right to interview voters as long as they stand where the campaign workers stand—100 feet away from the sign posted outside of the polling place. Photojournalists can use a zoom lens.
The more interesting case than this one would be a case against a municipality whose police department actually stops a newspaper reporter or a photojournalist from fulfilling their assignment when they are standing 100 feet from the polling place just like the campaign workers. It is unlikely that we will see a case like that in New Jersey for a federal election.
A former administrator and a former shop foreman at the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission were convicted at trial today of charges that they directed subordinate employees to complete repairs or improvements at private homes while on-duty for the PVSC, according to Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman.Read More >
Days Since Last Christie Press Conference (Jan. 9)
Greenstein versus Watson Coleman in Princeton PRINCETON – When Princeton Community Democratic Organization (PCDO) Chairman Jim Durbin announced a second ballot runoff tonight and the losers headed for the back of the room, he alerted committee members to the names of the two surviving competitors. But people already...
BY JEFF BRINDLE Anytime now, the U.S. Supreme Court will render a decision in McCutcheon v. FEC. And while reformists may not like it, the high court is likely to allow national parties to raise far more money. That could strengthen them... Read More >
"The governor has allowed political cronyism to continue and even flourish, rather than stamp it out, with some of his closest confidants enriching themselves through millions of dollars in state contracts, and legal and lobbying fees, an Asbury Park Press review of thousands of pages of campaign, lobbying and contracting documents found."- The Asbury Park Press
Press releases are submitted by PolitickerNJ users, not by staff. They do not represent the viewpoint of PolitickerNJ.com.