Want access to post press releases? To sign up, use this form. You must be logged in.
I write you today because your rationale in endorsing Rep. Rob Andrews for his party’s nomination to the U.S. Senate leaves me puzzled and disappointed.
In your editorial, you referred to Andrews’ qualifications and what you called “a solid record in the House as a thoughtful legislator.” Unfortunately, the facts do not mesh with your characterization.
According to GovTrack.us, Rep. Andrews has introduced 579 bills in Congress since January 5, 1993. Of those 579 bills, only six have even made it out of committee, a percentage that GovTrack ranks as “Exceedingly Poor” compared to his congressional peers. Apparently, Mr. Andrews’ colleagues think so little of him and his ideas that they are only willing to debate less than 1% of his bills on the House floor.
Moreover, of those six bills that made it out of committee, Congress enacted only one into law. In baseball terms, that gives Rep. Andrews a career batting average in Congress of .002. He has utterly failed the people of this district by his inability to navigate the legislative system.
The second reason you gave for endorsing Rep. Andrews is that, in your opinion, he would bring “a fresh approach to the challenges facing New Jersey.” While younger than Sen. Lautenberg, Andrews remains a man who has been a Washington insider since 1989. As a career politician, Rep. Andrews is part of the problem, not the solution.
It is no wonder that in the Power Rankings recently compiled for the House of Representatives by Congress.org, Rep. Andrews fell 130 positions from 68th to 198th in 2008. In fact, scores of legislators with far less seniority leapfrogged over Mr. Andrews, who ranked the fifth lowest from the Class of 1990.
According to that source, Andrews’ legislative record earned him a score of 3 out of 100. As for his influence in Congress amongst his peers, Mr. Andrews received the lowest possible score: zero.
Perhaps Rep. Andrews’ lack of power and influence in Congress is the reason why New Jersey only receives 61 cents back for every dollar in taxes that we send to Washington. That paltry figure ranks us dead last among the 50 states.
Your readers should know that the criteria used in your endorsement are faulty and, therefore, the endorsement is misleading at best.
Emerging as a formidable candidate for Regional Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is Bill Matsikoudis, the Jersey City ... >
There's nothing more difficult to see than the history before your eyes. It sometimes takes generations to understand the significance of ... >
OK, he didn't say precisely that, but when the Chairman of the Budget Committee informs us that governmental spending is the key to prosperity, ... >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
The sub prime mortgage melt down and its ensuing financial “crisis” has tested the mettle of all of us who believe in and support the free ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
The media, which loves headlines and knows little history, is trying to sell President Elect Obama as another Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But that ... >
When I was eleven, way back in 1965, my family was invited for Thanksgiving to my cousins’ cousins, a Jewish-Italian family who lived in the ... >
Last week's fight between Henry Waxman and John Dingell for chairmanship of the powerful House Energy and Commerce committee also featured a less ... >
A couple of weeks ago, my mother, Angelina Katz, did her second debate on behalf of Barack Obama. A debate? My mother? If you knew her, you’d be ... >
A rained out MusicFest this past September has provided Union County with $275,000 in insurance monies. The Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders ... >
As New Jerseyans get ready to celebrate Thanksgiving the nation's economic outlook is indeed bleak, and there doesn't seem much to be ... >