Today’s Valerie Huttle Chutzpah Award is Republican Assemblywoman Charlotte Vandervalk, who is suddenly against the government borrowing money without taxpayer approval, despite her vote in support of a 1997 $2.75 billion pension bond borrowing plan. Vandervalk has written an Op-Ed criticizing Governor Jon Corzine’s asset monetization plan.
Read Vandervalk’s opinion piece:
Walks like a Duck. Quacks like a Duck. Looks like Borrowing to Me.
I am going to tell you right up front that I am confused about Governor Corzine’s proposed "asset monetization/road sale plan." And if I am confused, as a State legislator who will be shortly called to vote on the scheme, then I can only imagine just how confused the average taxpayer is.
Part of our collective confusion stems from the fact that the Governor hasn’t given us any details about his plan. And what little he has said only adds to the confusion. In his 2007 Budget Address, he said; "Now let me be clear – borrowing to meet operating expenses is a terrible idea. And transferring an interest in a state asset to fund operating expenses is worse. And it is not under consideration." With Clintonian politispeak, he said this with a straight face right after listing a host of NEW SPENDING that he wanted. So it seems pretty clear that his monetization plan will be used for NEW SPENDING.
Maybe as a wealthy, single guy, the Governor just doesn’t understand a basic fact of fiscal life for us average homeowners and taxpayers - IF YOU CAN’T AFFORD YOUR CURRENT EXPENSES, YOU CUT YOUR SPENDING. YOU DON’T BUY SOMETHING NEW.
As a "financial whiz" from Goldman Sachs, the Governor was perceived as one who could bring his business knowledge to the Statehouse, find cost savings, streamline the system, get us the best bang for our tax buck. Unfortunately, the reality has become just another rich guy creating another way around the law so that he doesn’t have to pay the freight - someone else does - and that someone else is the New Jersey resident. Let me explain.
Our State Constitution says that the State cannot increase the state’s debt without voter approval. Court cases have clearly upheld this as a protection for taxpayers. So what is the Governor proposing? He will "sell/lease" our state roadways to a newly-created state agency. And how is the agency going to pay for that?" Why, they are going to borrow the money - more money than the State has ever borrowed before. And the Governor will say that the State isn’t doing the borrowing, the new agency is. THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN A RICH GUY SETTING UP A SHELL COMPANY TO BORROW MONEY THAT HE CAN’T LEGALLY BORROW HIMSELF.
In the same Budget Address, the Governor said; "Potentially, asset monetization could reset the state’s finances by dramatically reducing our debt burden, and consequently reducing debt service." But the debt burden wouldn’t really go away, it would just shift from the State’s ledger to the new shell company’s books. How will the new agency pay for the borrowing? EXPECT THE TOLLS TO DOUBLE OR TRIPLE IMMEDIATELY on the Garden State Parkway and the Turnpike with more increases to follow. And since Bergen County pays proportionately more tolls on the GSP than the rest of the state, our riders will bear the brunt of that toll increase.
In essence, the Governor - through this new state agency - will be mortgaging our state assets and we, although we are the true owners of those assets, will, as taxpayers and consumers, be making the monthly payments. In my real world, this is called borrowing. So, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it looks like borrowing to me. And our State Constitution says that any borrowing - much less the biggest amount ever borrowed in the State’s history - must be approved by the people who are going to be ultimately responsible for the paying the debt - the people of New Jersey.
So, what can we do about this? If the Governor’s scheme is close to what I have outlined above, a shell company organized on the backs of New Jersey taxpayers, then I will push for a coalition --- individuals as well groups in opposition --- to join forces in a lawsuit. The courts have spoken in the past. We now must look for enforcement. Such massive debt should only proceed if approved by the voters in a referendum. This duck shouldn’t fly until the people of New Jersey say it can fly.
The feud between Republican State Senator Gerald Cardinale and Democratic Bergen County Executive Dennis McNerney continues. Today, ... >
It's hard to not be concerned these days. We've all witnessed frustration with our institutions before but I never remember anything of this ... >
Instead of borrowing trillions to waste on make-work governmental projects, stimulate the economy with tax cuts. >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
In December 2008, the Holy See released a new document dealing with bioethics called “Dignitas Personae.” This “instruction” from the ... >
Hard to believe we have arrived at the last year of the first decade of the 21st century. Boy, seems like it was just yesterday that Bush was handed ... >
It's actually come to this: A panel convened by the legislature of the State of New Jersey has concluded that discrimination is not good. Maybe ... >
As it tends to, history seems to be repeating itself as 240 laid-off workers at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago revive a decades old tactic -- ... >
Many columnists write a "year in review" or a "predictions" piece for the New Year, however I decided to refrain from going down ... >
Five Democrat governors including New Jersey’s Jon Corzine and New York’s David Paterson have called upon the incoming Obama administration to ... >
Your Reaching Here Wally..
A little bit different circumstances, don't you think? Everyone knows the pension mess was a mistake now, but to compare Asset Monetization with something from 10 years ago that didn't have anything to do with tripling the tolls is a little unfair.
This is why the Republicans have lost the confidence of voters
I noticed on the tally sheet that both DeCroce and Malone voted yes, while Mike Carroll shows consistency by voting no.
This is a classic example of Republicans seeking Democratic votes to justify bad government.
O'Toole
He voted yes also...
You've
got her by the stones here Wally.
You expect something different?
You expect something different from a New Jersey politician? This is the norm for this state. At least all of them will have a career in a pancake house with the flip/flops they make.
"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
--Theodore Roosevelt--
You forgot the $8.6 Billion School Construction Scam
Charlotte voted for that one also.
Six worth lauding
There were six Assembly Republicans with the stones to defy the governor. Besides Mike Carroll, the following former (and soon to be former) Assembly members deserve kudos.
Sen. Bucco, Rep. Garrett, Asm. Gregg, Sen. Lance & former Asw. Myers.
At least they stuck to principle. Too little of that these days on either side of the aisle.
Don't blame Charlotte, she
Don't blame Charlotte, she can't help it; she's an airhead.
But O'Toole is just a bad person and I think will end up leaving the Senate in handcuffs with his jacket pulled over his head.
"Sometimes it looks as if the Democrats are out to win at all costs, while the Republicans are out to compromise at all costs." Thomas Sowell, September 8, 2007 - Random Thoughts.
The curse of balanced budgets
All majority parties have to swallow big pills to falsely balance budgets without increasing taxes from time to time. Unfortunate considering either way it falls on the backs of the taxpayers --right away or over time. I suspect of the remaining Republicans who voted for the 97 deal, most if not all, secretly regret voting Yes. In time similar vote tallies for deals like the most recent TTF program or for the Governor's upcoming toll restructuring gimmick will be used to highlight similar Democrat hypocrisy. As for Vandervalk, I think her opening salvo sums up a lot "I am confused..."
Another Award ????
Regarding the Corizine Roadway Acquistion Program ,what will former Assemblywomen now State Senators Buono, Gill, Turner and Weinberg do. They also voted no on the Pension Bonds. But please don't forget Assemblymen Greenwald,Wisniewski and Speaker Roberts do when confronted with their no vote.
It was unwise fiscal policy then as well as now. We trust this time there will be more wisdom and respect for the Constitution,the tax payers and toll payers.
Chutzpah Indeed
The only thing worse than excessive taxation and excessive spending is cutting taxes and then borrowing money to cover the costs of ongoing bloat.
The dirty littly secret of New Jersey's massive indebtedness is that there's lots and lots of rich people who LIKE getting high interest payments TAX FREE off the backs of mostly middle class taxpayers.
Folks, we're being robbed blind by both parties; and it all amounts to legalized theft/corruption.
From Frederick Douglass
Did they write newspaper pieces about it in 97?
If those legislators did, then they deserve to hear it...if they just voted no, well then who knows why they did.
But ol Charlotte has a great explanation she can use..."It was ok because it was a Republican Governor!!!"