PolitickerNJ Wire Feed

By Lawrence E. McCullough | October 1st, 2012 - 9:00pm
| More

“The thing I fear most is that we’ll have five, six or seven Floridas this November, where the election is close enough that there’s no longer a margin of victory you’re talking about, there’s a margin of litigation, and we will not know the winner of the presidential race for hours or days or perhaps in the case of somewhere like Florida, perhaps for quite sometime, and the next president takes office or continues in office under a cloud.”

A liberal activist sounding the alarm of impending electoral chaos in the wake of new voting restrictions across the U.S.?

Not even close.

It’s a prediction by former Wall Street Journal columnist John Fund speaking before the conservative Heritage Foundation on Aug. 7, 2012.

And it supports several conclusions set forth in Voting Law Changes in 2012, a 64-page report compiled by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law that studied the expected impact of 19 new voting laws and two voting-related executive actions passed in 14 states in 2011 and 2012:

  • The new laws could make it significantly harder for more than five million eligible voters to cast ballots in 2012 and are expected to sharply tilt the political terrain for this year’s Presidential election.
  • These new restrictions fall most heavily on young, minority and low-income voters, as well as on voters with disabilities.
  • The states that have already cut back on voting rights will provide 171 electoral votes in 2012 – 63% of the 270 votes needed to win the presidency.
  • Of the 12 likely battleground states, as assessed by a recent Los Angeles Times analysis of Gallup polling, five have already cut back on voting rights (and may pass additional restrictive legislation), and two more are currently considering new restrictions.

 Overall, 32 states have some form of voter ID law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. 3 [See list here]

The new voting laws are being widely contested via grass-roots challenges in numerous local and state courts and by U.S. Department of Justice suits against laws in Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Alabama, Wisconsin and California.

Prior to the 2006 elections, no state required its voters to show government-issued photo ID at the polls or elsewhere. In 2006, Indiana became the first state in the nation to implement photo ID requirements. The Indiana League of Women Voters sued in state and federal courts (Crawford v. Marion County Election Board), contending the law disenfranchised voters. The League lost both cases.

Advocates of strict voter ID laws explain that the new requirements work to prevent fraud – chiefly, people voting who are ineligible or an individual using another person’s identity to vote. Opponents reply that actual documented cases of voter impersonation in recent U.S. elections are extremely rare.

Statistically, you’re more likely to be struck by lightning than verify a documented case of voter fraud, said Loyola Law School-Los Angeles professor Justin Levitt in his September, 2011, testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights.

** CLICK HERE to see Full Article **

Contact Info: 

Lawrence E. McCullough, Press Director

Hall Institute of Public Policy-NJ

P.O. Box 8051, Trenton NJ 08650

Phone:  (609) 392-2237

lmccullough@hallnj.org

Wake-Up Call

Morning Digest: September 30th

Dems fail to pry sufficient number from abstemious GOP caucus to pass debt report bill TRENTON - The Assembly this afternoon could not summon the necessary votes to override Gov. Chris Christie's veto of A961, as Assembly Minority Leader Jon Bramnick (R-21) prevented Democrats - some of them outraged...

Op-Ed

Legislation needed for publicly financed gubernatorial elections

By JEFF BRINDLE It is critical that the Legislature soon enact a pending bill that would ensure the state’s Gubernatorial Public Financing Program is available in the event of a special election for governor.  Not only is there no current legal... Read More >

Contributors

In tribute to John Sheridan, a good and great man     I first learned late last night from television news that John P. Sheridan, Jr. and his wife, Joyce had... more »
(9-24-14) The Founding Fathers and the Militarization of the Police - No matter what the grand jury in Ferguson, Missouri decides, the debate over the militarization of... more »
(Trenton, NJ) --  On September 23, 2015 I shall dig this up and eat whatever crow I've got coming, but in the meantime only a listicle... more »
 The following letter was sent today to Republican state legislators, county chairs, state committee members, and New Hampshire... more »

Quote of the Day

quote of the day

"When you're asked to cast a vote on a bill and it seems innocuous, and it's got a hidden land mine that perhaps only an expert would see, it would sort of behoove those experts to tell us in advance rather than make us look, shall we say, a little bit indecisive later on." - Assemblyman Michael Patrick Carroll (R-25).

- NJTV

Poll

Which of these "Mount Rushmore of Corruption" states deserves the centerpiece?:

Blogroll

Visit the PolitickerNJ.com/resources page for links to the best collection of information on New Jersey state government.

 

  • Polls
  • The best blogs
  • Columnists
  • State election results
  • Assembly election results
  • Local party websites
  • And more.

PolitickerNJ.com/resources