TRENTON – Democratic priority one, step one complete. The Senate Judiciary Committee voted on party lines, 8-4, to advance the marriage equality law, S1, this afternoon.
There was a line to get into Committee Room 4, or even the adjacent overflow room, all day; still, the hearing was very respectful, if emotionally charged and somewhat tense.
Early on, committee chairman, state Sen. Nicholas Scutari, (D-22), Linden, said he was implementing timed testimony and cutting off the discussion at 2:30 p.m. for a final vote.
Groups of four paraded before the committee. Supporters recounted stories from hospital rooms and jury duty to paint a picture of discrimination based on their private sexual preferences. For the other side, one bill opponent said, “If you vote (for) this bill in, in essence, you’re voting against God.” Clergy spoke in favor; clergy spoke against.
In the end, the crowd endorsed the panel vote with sonorous applause over a backdrop of boos. Eight Democrats approved the bill, and four Republicans opposed the measure, but only one senator’s vote was in question when the day began: state Sen. Kip Bateman, (R-16), Branchburg.
“I'm not sure since I've been in the Legislature that we've had a more emotionally charged issue than we've had today,” Bateman said. “I come into this, today, open-minded on the issue (but) I'm not sure this is going to fly with ths governor.” Bateman said the referendum option may be the best one. "I don't think the govenror's going to sign it," he said. "New Jerseyans are well-educated. Let's put it on the ballot."
Gov. Chris Christie is expected to veto the bill if it is passed and also called for a referendum on the matter today. State Sen. President Steve Sweeney, (D-3), West Deptford, immediately shot down the possibility today in the committee hearing.
Bill sponsor, state Sen. Ray Lesniak, (D-20), Elizabeth, took umbrage with the referendum proposal. "This isn't sports betting," he said. “It's up to the Legislature to guarantee that same-sex couples can exercise this right,” he said.
Previously a proponent of civil unions over marriage equality, state Sen. Paul Sarlo, (D-36), Wood-Ridge, changed his stance today. "Civil unions are not working," he said. "Same sex couples are being forced to disclose their sexual preference in job interviews," etc. He also said the vote on this bill was rushed and "set up to fail" in 2009.
State Sen. Joe Vitale, (D-19), Woodbridge, voted in place of state Sen. Bob Smith, (D-17), Piscataway, who was absent. State Sen. Gerald Cardinale, (R-39), Demarest, also was absent.
State Sen. Joe Kyrillos, (R-13), Middletown, said he understands the importance of the issue, but questioned whether it should be the number one priority of the state legislative bodies. But he also called on the Attorney General and the Health Commissioner to investigate whether the civil union law is functioning properly.
The Star-Ledger will make a "significant announcement" to employees early next month, according to a source.Read More >
'We believe in redemption': Roque heads into 2015 with full backing of the HCDO WEST NEW YORK – When local pain specialist Dr. Felix Roque delivered U.S. Rep. Albio Sires (D-8) from discomfort and restored him to the golf course, the congressman in return indulged the political fancies of...
By Jeff Brindle An August 15, 2014 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Stanley Chesler reaffirmed the place of political parties in the State’s electoral system. By rejecting arguments that unaffiliated voters should have a right to vote in... Read More >
"I think he was an army general, what was he?" - state Sen. Nick Sacco (D-32)- PolitickerNJ
Press releases are submitted by PolitickerNJ users, not by staff. They do not represent the viewpoint of PolitickerNJ.com.